Quote:
Originally Posted by Peakster
I wish there was a practical way to A-B-A experiment with it.
|
I was just thinking about that today... It's actually funny - just the other day a friend of mine brought up acetone and how it really bothered him... Every time gas goes up 20-30 cents, a question about acetone comes up :P
But here's the rub... if the benefits are small enough that it's difficult to tell the difference between tanks - even multiple tanks - it would seem logical to say that acetone is not cost effective :/
I think a more proper test would include:
1. Baseline - FE before acetone
2. Add acetone to first tank
3. Acetone second tank - record change
4. Acetone third tank - is FE change still there?
5. Acetone 4th tank - FE change still there?
6. Acetone 5th tank - FE change still there?
7. No acetone next tank - FE must change to verify results
8. No acetone next tank - did FE stabilize?
The reason for so many tanks? If you're getting gains by cleaning out your fuel system - that's not because of chemical magic, that's just poor maintenance on your part. So those 5 tanks of acetone would hopefully give a trend and might possibly show that it was your internals being cleaned rather than chemistry :P
But - weather is an issue (this takes quite a bit of time), especially for those of us that use human powered transportation :P Now for someone that's on the road a lot
Personally -- that's a lot of testing to prove something that yields small results. I mean, if the results were significantly large, we'd all be doing it :P And an oil company would likely pick it up. Imagine if BP could claim their fuel gets you 20% better FE - imagine the lines at their stations :P