3 cylinder cars - Fuelly Forums

Click here to see important news regarding the aCar App

Go Back   Fuelly Forums > Fuel Talk > General Fuel Topics
Today's Posts Search Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 01-15-2007, 01:45 PM   #1
Supporting Member
 
Hockey4mnhs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 760
Country: United States
3 cylinder cars

How many 3 cylinder cars are made by well known car makers. I know geo makes a 3 cylinder but are there any more well known ones out there?
__________________

__________________
Hockey4mnhs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2007, 01:46 PM   #2
*shrug*
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
None that I know of. What's geo, by the way?
__________________

SVOboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2007, 01:54 PM   #3
Registered Member
 
omgwtfbyobbq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,516
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wikipedia
The straight-3 is the smallest engine in use in modern cars, generally for engine displacements of around 1.0L. Cars in the 'super-mini' class often use them on base models, as do the Japanese Keicars. A straight-3 is also used in the Suzuki Swift, its American cousins: the Geo Metro and the Chevrolet Sprint, the Subaru Justy, the Honda Insight, and also two stroke Saabs (93 - 96). One experimental Saab had two transverse straight-3 engines, the Saab Monster.

The smallest straight-3 engine was the 543 cc Suzuki F5A used in the 1982 Cervo. Smart currently produces a diminutive 799 cc Diesel straight-3, the smallest ever. Most straight-3 engines fall below 1.2 liters, with a 1198 cc Volkswagen unit seen as the largest petrol unit. A 1.8 L (1779 cc) Diesel was produced by Alfa Romeo for their 1984 33 1.8 TD, the largest straight-3 ever produced.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by FormulaTwo
I think if i could get that type of FE i would have no problem driving a dildo shaped car.
omgwtfbyobbq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2007, 02:06 PM   #4
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 682
Country: United States
I don't know why automakers don't produce boxer-style 2 cylinder engines like the one in the old Citroen 2CV. The engine should be smooth(ish) because the firing order is even, and primary balance is very good. Triples are always unbalanced, and because of it, they sound like a bucket full of lockwashers at full throttle.

A 1 liter boxer twin ought to be capable of producing 80-100 BHP. Subaru already makes boxer engines. They could cut their 4 cylinder engines in half to make a 1.2 liter that would have killer economy in one of their lighter cars like the Impreza. Or, BMW could install one of its motorcycle engines in its 3-series.
__________________
Capitalism: The cream rises. Socialism: The scum rises.
Sludgy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2007, 03:30 PM   #5
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,978
Country: United States
Mistu

Mitsubishi is rumored to provide the U.S. version of the SMART ForTwo with a 1.0L, 3-cyl. gasser.

RH77
__________________
rh77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2007, 03:44 PM   #6
Registered Member
 
JanGeo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,444
Country: United States
Location: Tiverton, RI
Send a message via Yahoo to JanGeo
In line 3 cylinder engines are balanced very well with the 120 degree crank spacings and vibrate very little if at all. My Geo was perfectally smooth. THe BMW Boxer 1 liter in my motorcycle has good balance but a heck of a power pulse and rocks side to side because of the offset crank journals. If you ever rode a K750 triple you would know what smooth is - actually it is too smooth.
JanGeo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2007, 04:19 PM   #7
QDM
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 128
Country: United States
I had an 88 Subaru Justy that had a 3 cylinder 1.2L engine, 3 valves per cylinder, with a counter balance shaft. It was smooth running and very zippy. Only thing I didn't like about the engine was the computer controlled carb.

Q
QDM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2007, 04:59 PM   #8
Registered Member
 
basjoos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 392
Country: United States
The Honda Insight is a 3-banger that smooths out the engine vibrations by feeding a "anti-vibration" signal to the electric motor to counteract the vibration impulses coming from the ICE.
__________________
]
aerocivic.com
basjoos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2007, 06:55 AM   #9
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 682
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by JanGeo View Post
In line 3 cylinder engines are balanced very well with the 120 degree crank spacings and vibrate very little if at all. My Geo was perfectally smooth. THe BMW Boxer 1 liter in my motorcycle has good balance but a heck of a power pulse and rocks side to side because of the offset crank journals. If you ever rode a K750 triple you would know what smooth is - actually it is too smooth.
Inline 3 cylinder engines can have 120 degree crank throws for even firing, but their balance is poor caused by a "rocking couple". Triples can use balance shafts to cancel the rocking couple.

Motorcycle inline triples like the K750 feel smoother than big inline twins because twins are incredibly imbalanced. Twins with even firing have massive imbalances caused by both pistons going up and down simultaneously. Boxer twins don't have primary imbalance and are much smoother than inline twins.

Also, consider the effect of the mass of the pistons. 250 cc pistons for a 750 triple have a LOT less reciprocating mass than the pistons for a 1000 boxer twin. Any small-piston engine feels a lot smoother than a large displacement engine.

At any rate, my main point was that a twin cylinder car of equal power to a three cylinder car will have better fuel economy, and the best format for a twin is a boxer twin.
__________________
Capitalism: The cream rises. Socialism: The scum rises.
Sludgy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2007, 10:08 AM   #10
Registered Member
 
JanGeo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,444
Country: United States
Location: Tiverton, RI
Send a message via Yahoo to JanGeo
Yes but they are harder to build being apposed and tend to puddle oil in the cylinders causing leakage past the rings plus have totally different valve train expansion problems - longer timing chains or belts or require long pushrods for the valves from a centrally located camshaft - longer intake manifolds for each head separate exhost headers etc. High performance boxer BMW motorcycles exhibited crank case stretching under heavy loads under race conditions. It is a great motor but it too has design trade offs.
__________________

JanGeo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Problems with Total Miles Driven bmalachuk Fuelly Web Support and Community News 4 05-02-2011 04:15 PM
Fuelly Android App - eehokie Fuelly Web Support and Community News 2 07-14-2010 09:59 PM
No MPG on next tank after partial fuel-up ? insightfulone Fuelly Web Support and Community News 1 04-18-2010 12:54 PM
Combined totals of all my vehicles? nizationpcs Fuelly Web Support and Community News 0 03-30-2009 07:41 AM
Retire a Vehicle pb Fuelly Web Support and Community News 1 11-11-2008 04:30 PM

» Fuelly Android Apps
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.