|
|
05-16-2006, 07:54 PM
|
#1
|
Supporting Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 318
Country: United States
|
Higher gear not always good for mpg?!
Found this somewhere, I forget where:
"If you are at 35mph and in 5th gear (Around 1800RPM in the average car), you will actually be wasting more gas than if you were in 4th or even 3rd. Every car has a certain range where it gets the best fuel economy, and it is usually right before the secondary air system opens up (on newer FI secondary intake runnersor carburated secondary "power" venturis cars with more than one barrel). Most cars have secondaries that open around 2800-3500 RPM, and this lets more air, and thus, fuel into the engine. The best RPM to be at to achieve best fuel economy is at right below this point."
I don't have a scangauge...or even a tach, somebody feel like verifying, or hopefully discrediting this statement. I usually upshift from 1st or 2nd into 4th @ 20mph. I have a 4spd std.
Frank.
__________________
|
|
|
05-16-2006, 07:56 PM
|
#2
|
*shrug*
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
|
I'll discredit it for
I'll discredit it for you...
Dan has tested and he tells me that no matter what the slower you go in 5th the better your gas mileage, even if you're madly lugging.
I've heard that also, and it's bull****, doesn't even make sense. And you definately do not have IABs on your car, so don't worrya bout this. I don't even see the logic in why higher rpms is better. I think Jangeo and metrompg have tested this also.
__________________
|
|
|
05-16-2006, 08:02 PM
|
#3
|
Supporting Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 318
Country: United States
|
*Sigh of relief* ..Anyone
*Sigh of relief* ..Anyone else?
|
|
|
05-16-2006, 08:08 PM
|
#4
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,223
Country: United States
|
at constant speed, lowest
at constant speed, lowest engine speed in the highest gear is most efficient.
see -
mini experiment: rpm/gear choice VS MPG at constant speed
http://www.gassavers.org/forum_topic/rpm_gear_choice_vs_mpg_at_constant_speed.html
mpg vs. speed - metro graph
http://www.gassavers.org/forum_topic/mpg_vs_speed_metro.html
the jury is still out on the issue of best gear/RPM for most efficient acceleration however.
|
|
|
05-16-2006, 08:16 PM
|
#5
|
Supporting Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 318
Country: United States
|
Quote:the jury is still out
Quote:
the jury is still out on the issue of best gear/RPM for most efficient acceleration however.
|
This is why I need a scan gauge! First I'd have to switch to obd1 or obd2 though.
|
|
|
05-16-2006, 08:20 PM
|
#6
|
*shrug*
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
|
OBD1 won't get you a
OBD1 won't get you a scangauge. An electronic VSS will get you a superMID though.
|
|
|
05-16-2006, 08:22 PM
|
#7
|
Supporting Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 318
Country: United States
|
How many pesos for the
How many pesos for the SuperMID? elec vss can be substituted easily?
|
|
|
05-16-2006, 08:27 PM
|
#8
|
*shrug*
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
|
160 shipped from japan land,
160 shipped from japan land, it can be. However, you have Sucky Injection System, so I dunno how it'd work for you,
|
|
|
05-16-2006, 08:37 PM
|
#9
|
Supporting Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 318
Country: United States
|
I think the 91 ef already
I think the 91 ef already has elec vss, no? What are you thinking might be affected by dpfi?
|
|
|
05-16-2006, 08:41 PM
|
#10
|
*shrug*
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
|
No, electronic began in 92,
No, electronic began in 92,
Anyway, the MID works by taking a 240cc (usually) injector pulse and multiplying it by four for total usage, but you've got weird size **** and two of them,
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Car Talk & Chit Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
» Fuelly iOS Apps |
|
|
|
» Fuelly Android Apps |
No Threads to Display.
|
|