From a stop should car be gunned up to speed?
O.K. the question is, from a stop, should one quickly accelerate up to a optimum operating speed where there will be the best mpg. Or should one accelerate , gradurally, which will take longer to get there & perhaps burn more gas than a faser accelaration over a shorter time. This is a physics/math question. Voulme = E MC 2, etc. Consider, if one wanted to stay the dryest and was in a stright down rain pour and wanted to go 300 feet to shelter. Should one walk or should one run for it, to stay the dryest? You see if you walk, you are being hit with the regular stright down drops for a longer time (like a slow acceleration). But, if one ran they would get the normal, stright down pour for a shorter length of time but, would also be running into rain that would have otherwise fell to the ground, had they not run into it. Seems like they are getting a double dose of rain but, for a shorter time. Would both ways get the same wetness? We will not consider if a wind was involved? I say they would get wetter to run. (Also, I think a fast acceleration will, over all, use more gas?). (plus the runner will run into rain down their whole front body & get very wet. A walker would mostly get the rain on ther head/shoulders (such would be wetter but the lower body would be dryer than if it ran into rain.) So we can mix MPG, Rain & physics/Einstien together and save money and gas.
__________________
|