Quote:
Originally Posted by Lurch
and WTF?? comparing steam to smoke?
so steam is a form of water.... is smoke a form of wood?
|
Yes. Smoke (along with ashes) is the burned form of wood.
Quote:
you can say anything you want but i am very thankful that you arent right.
|
So then what is smoke? Was it piped in by the special effects team?
Quote:
and for dalez... so your telling me that to burn something you have to separate the hydrogen and burn it with oxygen present by applying added energy like heat?
|
Close. To burn something, you have a chemical reaction between (usually) oxygen and something else. Heat is not added, it's the result of the combustion.
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/...367/combustion
Quote:
Combustion (chemical reaction)
rapid chemical reaction between substances that is usually accompanied by generation of heat and light in the form of flame. In most cases, oxygen comprises one of the reactants.
|
Oxygen + other reactive material in, heat and various material (maybe water [in the form of steam], ashes, or other) out. Combustion of hydrogen is the opposite of electrolysis: Electrolysis splits stable H2O into oxygen and hydrogen by adding energy, while combustion combines reactive oxygen and reactive hydrogen to make water and releases energy.
I can't speak for anyone else, but I'm in this thread to learn what I can, and teach others what I already know. Just because you can't "run your car on water" doesn't mean that electrolysis and on-board hydrogen/HHO/Brown's Gas generation are useless. It may be useful to enhance combustion, catalyze fuel, to store energy for later use, or for other purposes. It's awful hard to discuss it seriously with folks who understand basic chemistry amidst all the noise generated by miracle workers who claim to break the laws of thermodynamics.
Once it can be discussed rationally and seriously among people who are willing to look at it
realistically, something might be learned.