I am an open-minded skeptic. I don't believe things like this, but I'm not
against believing them -- you just have to give me some real data that's easy to trust before I can begin to take it seriously.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sceiauto
This device has been tested on a dyno, in L.A. by an independant testing agency. It showed that it doesn't decrease mileage, and that emissions are not increased.
|
The same can be said of not using the device.
Quote:
I knew that there was going to be a problem when the test had the 1999 Sebring getting 45 MPG, with the device it got 46 MPG.
|
So, they tested a car that is EPA rated 19/29, but they were getting 45mpg*; and the device made it go up to 46mpg? That is well within any but the most perfect test's margin for error, and not worth much even if it was an accurate test.
*: Ok, perhaps they were just testing at a steady 35mph with simulated normal drag load.
Quote:
When the device was tested by Nissan
|
That's the second time you have mentioned that without backing it up.
Quote:
they did it on the road in a very controlled setting and found 12% increase in mileage for city driving, and 9% increase in highway miles.
|
Why didn't that increase show up on the dyno? I imagine dyno testing would be the one showing better results.
Quote:
The on the road testing is being done right now in Australia and Canada for the gas and diesel models. I have offered to have a reader from this forum to try it out, without any interest.
|
Considering that you claim that it works by leaning the air/fuel ratio (you used more words, either to avoid saying "lean" or because you're not familiar with how engines work/haven't fully considered the device's effect) I'm not willing to risk my engine, nor do I feel comfortable giving my address to someone who has presented himself as a miracle snake oil salesman and has not provided any evidence to the contrary.