 |
|
07-08-2007, 03:36 PM
|
#11
|
|
...
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 425
Country: United States
|
Only *if* the car is unoccupied by live persons! The crash cage that has been built into the structure is a good design , I really just wonder about occupant damage/survivability .
__________________
|
|
|
|
07-08-2007, 06:37 PM
|
#12
|
|
|V3|2D
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,186
Country: United States
|
i bet you could survive a serious accident in that little thing. i mean really, when was the last time someone died in a formula car accident? i think it was in like 94 and he was going in the 190+ mph.
small cars can definitely be made very safe for US speed limits.
__________________
__________________
don't waste your time or time will waste you
|
|
|
|
|
07-08-2007, 06:52 PM
|
#13
|
|
...
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 425
Country: United States
|
Without a doubt on the safety on its structure ! I'd still like to see what damage occurs in a side impact similar to the frontal in the video .
|
|
|
|
|
07-08-2007, 10:32 PM
|
#14
|
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 321
Country: United States
|
If you tire of looking at that old video chestnut from Britain, and are interested in scientific testing of smart car passive safety, please take a close look at all of the videos in the following link:
http://www.thesmart.ca/index.cfm?id=...nguage=english
__________________
2008 Mercedes-Benz B 200 
2006 smart fortwo BRABUS Canada 1 cdi cabriolet 
2005 smart fortwo cdi pulse cabriolet 
1966 Peugeot 404 Coupe Injection 
|
|
|
|
|
07-09-2007, 01:39 AM
|
#15
|
|
...
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 425
Country: United States
|
Kinda interesting ! Thanks Mike T .
|
|
|
|
|
07-09-2007, 06:24 AM
|
#16
|
|
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 109
Country: United States
|
Even though the crash cage is pretty much entirely entact, don't you need some crumple area? I mean if I'm i a box and hit a wall at 60mph, I'd rather have the box deform a bit to absorb the impact rather than have no deformation would be like a wall hitting a wall at 60?
|
|
|
|
|
07-09-2007, 05:52 PM
|
#17
|
|
|V3|2D
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,186
Country: United States
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bbgobie
Even though the crash cage is pretty much entirely entact, don't you need some crumple area? I mean if I'm i a box and hit a wall at 60mph, I'd rather have the box deform a bit to absorb the impact rather than have no deformation would be like a wall hitting a wall at 60?
|
i guess you didnt watch the other videos....
__________________
don't waste your time or time will waste you
|
|
|
|
|
07-09-2007, 08:51 PM
|
#18
|
|
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 109
Country: United States
|
Which other videos?
|
|
|
|
|
07-10-2007, 06:10 PM
|
#19
|
|
|V3|2D
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,186
Country: United States
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bbgobie
Which other videos?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike T
|
__________________
don't waste your time or time will waste you
|
|
|
|
|
07-10-2007, 09:20 PM
|
#20
|
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 358
Country: United States
|
The smart car's framing was specifically designed to "absorb" front end impacts. I forget what they called it, but there the frame's focal point is right up front and is the strongest there....
70-0 instantly, it didnt do too bad
__________________
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Car Talk & Chit Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Fuelly iOS Apps |
|
|
|
» Fuelly Android Apps |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:28 AM.
Linear Mode
