Screw the new civic and the fit, this baby is just right... - Fuelly Forums

Click here to see important news regarding the aCar App

Go Back   Fuelly Forums > The Pub > General Discussion (Off-Topic)
Today's Posts Search Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 03-20-2006, 05:01 PM   #1
Registered Member
 
Compaq888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,460
Country: United States
Screw the new civic and the fit, this baby is just right...

The 2007 toyota yaris
http://www.toyota.com/yaris/index.html

5 speed manual is 2,288 lbs and gets 34mpg city and 40mpg freeway. While the honda fit gets 33 for city and 38 for hwy, pathetic.

not to mention the 4 door yaris looks cool. The sides are corollish and the front and back is camrish.

Put some lightweight rims on it, take out the spare and inflate the tires and I'm sure it will do 40mpg city and 45mpg freeway.

it costs $11,825 for the 4 door. Not a bad deal.

I'm not saying I'm buying it because it's cheaper to drive my reliable gas guzzling heavy car but when it dies it would be a good idea to buy this yaris. I think my car will last me another 6-7 years so I might get a second gen yaris or a 3rd gen prius.
__________________

__________________

Compaq888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2006, 05:04 PM   #2
*shrug*
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
I think your mpg goals for

I think your mpg goals for it are a little optimistic based on those mods...

Anyway, the yaris is a replacement for the echo, which I believe got better mileage, so I think "boo toyota."

EDIT: Echo got 35/42, so yeah.
__________________

SVOboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2006, 05:13 PM   #3
Registered Member
 
Compaq888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,460
Country: United States
They are not optimistic at

They are not optimistic at all. I increased 4mpg on my gas guzzler by just inflating the tires and the 2 trays.

my oem wheels are 20 pounds each. If you install lighter wheels the car will receive better mpg. Also if you add taller tires even better mpg.

Not to mention i'm not your average american. I don't have a gut around my knees. My weight is below 130lbs fully dressed. So that is some more weight reduction.
__________________

Compaq888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2006, 05:17 PM   #4
*shrug*
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
Quote:They are not

Quote:
They are not optimistic at all. I increased 4mpg on my gas guzzler by just inflating the tires and the 2 trays.
I increased my MPG none by adding 15 pounds to all my tires.

Quote:
my oem wheels are 20 pounds each. If you install lighter wheels the car will receive better mpg. Also if you add taller tires even better mpg.
Your wheels are not yaris wheels.

Quote:
Not to mention i'm not your average american. I don't have a gut around my knees. My weight is below 130lbs fully dressed. So that is some more weight reduction.
50-100 pounds will net .5-1% increase, which is .15-.3 mpg approximately.
SVOboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2006, 05:25 PM   #5
Driving on E
 
Matt Timion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,110
Country: United States
Re: They are not optimistic at

Quote:
Originally Posted by Compaq888
Not to mention i'm not your average american. I don't have a gut around my knees. My weight is below 130lbs fully dressed. So that is some more weight reduction.
You only weigh 130lbs? Why in the world are you driving that boat then?

Get yourself a canoe, or a kiyak.
Matt Timion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2006, 05:35 PM   #6
Registered Member
 
Compaq888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,460
Country: United States
Re: They are not optimistic at

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt Timion
Quote:
Originally Posted by Compaq888
Not to mention i'm not your average american. I don't have a gut around my knees. My weight is below 130lbs fully dressed. So that is some more weight reduction.
You only weigh 130lbs? Why in the world are you driving that boat then?

Get yourself a canoe, or a kiyak.
I want a canoe and will probably get one too. I don't drive a boat, more like a cargo ship. My Iron engine weighs more than a v6 motor.
__________________

Compaq888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2006, 11:29 AM   #7
|V3|2D
 
thisisntjared's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,186
Country: United States
Send a message via AIM to thisisntjared
does anybody else think its

does anybody else think its strange that the yaris hatch weighs 2# more than the sedan?? and its also 2.5in taller??

anyway, it does look a lot better than the fit, but its still 5 feet tall too much for such a narrow car. havent they ever heard of the golden ratio???
__________________
don't waste your time or time will waste you
thisisntjared is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2006, 11:47 AM   #8
Registered Member
 
JanGeo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,444
Country: United States
Location: Tiverton, RI
Send a message via Yahoo to JanGeo
heavier

Hey glass is really heavy so if it has a slightly larger rear window or a side window then that is more weight - man that hatchback is small. Bet you have a hard time fitting stuff in the back from the way the sides of the roof taper inwards - been there seen that in a 3 year old Volvo wagon and wacked my head good in the driver seat - no freeking room to move either. Now I know where all the ViewPoint crap is coming from on my client computers - damn 3D viewing software. You would think they could get the MPG up a little more - I just did the Ocean Drive run but had to detour as they are digging up the roads for new water pipes - still got 46.3 MPG with two red lights . . . damn I drive good!
JanGeo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2006, 01:33 PM   #9
*shrug*
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
Quote:does anybody else

Quote:
does anybody else think its strange that the yaris hatch weighs 2# more than the sedan?? and its also 2.5in taller??

anyway, it does look a lot better than the fit, but its still 5 feet tall too much for such a narrow car. havent they ever heard of the golden ratio???
The echo, yaris, and new corolla are all tall and narrow, I dunno why. Makes me puke though.
SVOboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2006, 03:50 PM   #10
Registered Member
 
philmcneal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 333
Country: Canada
lol just because the fit

lol just because the fit lagged behind a few numbers doesn't make it horrible. I still think fit is the better car because of standard safety features (toyota canada totally boched us, while the fit here in canada has a high msrp) and if I had to guess, is probably the better FF car if both of them were to race each other.

What also makes it exceptional is the cargo storage, compared to the yaris, the fit can "fit" anything you ask for.

Now... if yall only like hatches like we do however i'm more excited about the fit hybrid than any of the eco cars coming out right now since 1) they are all overpriced imo... its almost like car companies can charge a premium for efficent cars. Efficent no longer means cheap unless you go for a corolla or even a 7th gen civic if you can find a low mileage one.

and 2) the cars themselfs... are smaller than their economy counterparts (civic corolla, any car in that category) yet more expensive than their larger cousins. Sure honda fit is smaller but for the same price, you can get a fully loaded mazda 3.

but you'll deal with the gas prices, and car companies got you on that one!

From a Canadian point of view ^^
__________________

__________________
If your reading this, then good for you, your saving some gas because your here.
philmcneal is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Fuelly Android Apps
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.