|
|
04-13-2006, 09:44 AM
|
#1
|
Driving on E
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,110
Country: United States
|
Possible gaslog modification
I was thinking about the gaslog and I had an idea that I believe was mentioned before.
COnsidering that we have the EPA ratings for our vehicles, would it be have the top ten be the top MPG, or the top percent over EPA estimates?
I can see pros and cons for both.
__________________
|
|
|
04-13-2006, 09:58 AM
|
#2
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,223
Country: United States
|
if you're in a programming
if you're in a programming mood, why not both? it's all good!
__________________
|
|
|
04-13-2006, 10:02 AM
|
#3
|
Driving on E
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,110
Country: United States
|
Re: if you're in a programming
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
if you're in a programming mood, why not both? it's all good!
|
LOL... not a bad idea. I was just looking at the code and I'm embarrased how sloppy it is. Man, I need to just take my time when I code stuff.
|
|
|
04-13-2006, 10:15 AM
|
#4
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 331
Country: United States
|
'
vote for top percent over EPA
__________________
"You have to know the truth, and seek the truth, and the truth will set you free."
-unknown
|
|
|
04-13-2006, 10:48 AM
|
#5
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,223
Country: United States
|
suggestion - each individual
suggestion - each individual car's gaslog should show its cumulative (avg) mpg as a number. unless i'm missing something, you have to deduce it from the graph, or find it in a user's forum post.
|
|
|
04-13-2006, 11:12 AM
|
#6
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,480
Country: United States
Location: Myrtle Beach, SC
|
Re: Possible gaslog modification
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt Timion
I was thinking about the gaslog and I had an idea that I believe was mentioned before.
COnsidering that we have the EPA ratings for our vehicles, would it be have the top ten be the top MPG, or the top percent over EPA estimates?
I can see pros and cons for both.
|
I would prefer % over EPA (go figure) but I would like to hear the pros and cons of both. The way I look at it, this site is all about doing the best you can with what you have. Using % over EPA normalizes everyone regardless of the car that they have.
__________________
|
|
|
04-13-2006, 11:55 AM
|
#7
|
Driving on E
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,110
Country: United States
|
Re: suggestion - each individual
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
suggestion - each individual car's gaslog should show its cumulative (avg) mpg as a number. unless i'm missing something, you have to deduce it from the graph, or find it in a user's forum post.
|
This is something Imeant to do but it slipped my mind. I'm slowly working to make the gaslog and garage more intertwined.
I need to make a few code changes sometime soon, and I might end up removing the MPG figures in the posts considering that people can now use pretty images to display their MPG figures
|
|
|
04-13-2006, 12:06 PM
|
#8
|
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,209
Country: United States
|
Re: if you're in a programming
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt Timion
I was just looking at the code and I'm embarrased how sloppy it is.
|
*View / Source*
!!!!
Nah, that's a good question though. I would like to see ...hell I don't know, both!
|
|
|
04-13-2006, 12:15 PM
|
#9
|
Driving on E
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,110
Country: United States
|
Re: if you're in a programming
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaX
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt Timion
I was just looking at the code and I'm embarrased how sloppy it is.
|
*View / Source*
!!!!
|
No, not THAT code... the PHP code behind the gaslog... it's a mess. I think I'll need a Rosetta Stone to interpret it.
|
|
|
04-13-2006, 06:25 PM
|
#10
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,223
Country: United States
|
had another thought: another
had another thought: another approach that would level the playing field further would be to consider only the most recent N tanks.
lifetime/cumulative mpg is great, but it buries the successes of users who have made more recent gains (that partly applies to me, yes). and considering that most of us are continually modifying our cars & refining our driving style, a "last N" tank figure gives a more accurate picture of how things are *actually* going.
it would also serve to encourage users who have lots of tanks in the gaslog and figure they can never dig themselves out from under their "bad" tanks.
i'm not suggesting ditching the cumulative figure. it's useful. but it's not necessarily a fair or accurate way to compare vehicles/drivers.
i vote for last 10 tanks as N (which wouldn't affect my current LMPG figure anyway).
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Car Talk & Chit Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
» Fuelly iOS Apps |
|
» Fuelly Android Apps |
|
|
|