|
08-25-2006, 04:06 PM
|
#1
|
*shrug*
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
|
Neutralizing Our Environmental Impact
Think about it: http://www.targetneutral.com/TONIC/targetneutral1.jsp
We'll prolly be much less than average because our mileage is so kick ***, for me it estimated like 15 bucks for me, but I need to find out for sure about my co2 output just to get it right. If anyone has any other sites that do the same that aren't "look at us, we're BP" put them up.
__________________
|
|
|
08-25-2006, 04:12 PM
|
#2
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,225
Country: United States
|
__________________
|
|
|
08-25-2006, 04:15 PM
|
#3
|
*shrug*
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
|
The place I listed is BP as well,
|
|
|
08-25-2006, 04:20 PM
|
#4
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,978
Country: United States
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SVOboy
Think about it: http://www.targetneutral.com/TONIC/targetneutral1.jsp
We'll prolly be much less than average because our mileage is so kick ***, for me it estimated like 15 bucks for me, but I need to find out for sure about my co2 output just to get it right. If anyone has any other sites that do the same that aren't "look at us, we're BP" put them up.
|
CAUTION: conversions must be made for an accurate reading. This is a British site -- their "gallon" is a bit different, so MPG will be off. Take your MPG and multiply it by 1.1673 to get the English figure (if my calcs are correct). I made this mistake while visiting there and renting a car...
...and by the way, good find SVOboy -- it's all about reducing the "Carbon Footprint", I agree. Also, I'm a fan of "WhatCar?" magazine in Britain, which sponsors the site.
edit: also visit http://www.fueleconomy.gov
To convert tons to grams/kilogram: take the (tons*0.44)/(cars weight*2.2) to get the Metric equivalent (I think)...
edit2: www.edmunds.com for your vehicle weight
edit3: or just wait for someone to post a different site (zpiloto you beat me to it!) Now I get to check my calcs...
RH77
__________________
|
|
|
08-26-2006, 06:58 AM
|
#5
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 125
Country: United States
|
i'm at 12 pounds, it seems they want my money to spread the message? i think the trees in my yard should offset my co2.
|
|
|
08-26-2006, 09:42 AM
|
#6
|
*shrug*
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
|
They want money to plant more trees,
I don't think your trees count, because they are not there for the purpose of offsetting your footprint, they would've been there anyway.
|
|
|
08-31-2006, 03:36 PM
|
#7
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 612
Country: United States
|
Why I'd grow all sorts of 'trees' if I had my own property...
Trees rule. Nothing like carbon-neutral biofuels.
|
|
|
09-01-2006, 06:21 PM
|
#8
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,516
Country: United States
|
So, I produce a certain amount of carbon dioxide driving. I pay someone to plant trees. They require energy to run this business, and energy to plant the trees, which won't mature for years, which means more GHGs than if I were to drive, unless they factor in the GHG cost of their own operation...
On top of that, they'll take the profit they made and spend it, probably encouraging more economic growth, most of which is powered by fossil fuels. If this was funded by a group of fossil fuel interests, not only would they be making ph4t l00tz, they'd be spiking the short term fossil fuel emissions of every "greenie" who payed for trees, which probably won't eventually offset all of their GHG emissions because they're creating more GHGs doing something about their GHGs. God that's wrong...
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by FormulaTwo
I think if i could get that type of FE i would have no problem driving a dildo shaped car.
|
|
|
|
09-01-2006, 06:29 PM
|
#9
|
*shrug*
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
|
If you'd read the faq, you would realize this is not the case.
People seem to invent issues with charitable initiatives to persuade themselves to hold on to their money, but people never stop to consider that these things would not exist if they did more harm than good.
For example, if I had reasonable reason to believe that my being vegan harms more animals than not, I would not be. But your arguement is tantamount to saying that my lack of demand for dairy products creates a drop in price that results in an increase in consumption, which means I'm actually harming the little creatures. It doesn't make much sense.
They could have asked you to plant a tree yourself, but in my experience, people are much more willing to give you 20 dollars than miss their favorite tv show to go do something for themselves.
So, if you want to believe that this is a fund driven by people with the aim of destroying the environment, fine, that's your perogative, but don't insult the people who are trying to do something rather then sitting back with the attitude "nothing makes any difference besides to my fat wallet."
|
|
|
09-01-2006, 07:23 PM
|
#10
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,516
Country: United States
|
What faq?
__________________
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by FormulaTwo
I think if i could get that type of FE i would have no problem driving a dildo shaped car.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
Dilemma over testing
|
zpiloto |
General Discussion (Off-Topic) |
1 |
07-26-2006 01:50 PM |
Roflmao
|
Compaq888 |
General Discussion (Off-Topic) |
1 |
06-10-2006 07:35 AM |
|
» Car Talk & Chit Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
» Fuelly iOS Apps |
|
|
» Fuelly Android Apps |
|
|
|