Quote:
Originally Posted by ChewChewTrain
...This is actually better than factory cruise control, because it holds the gas pedal at a constant rate regardless of going up hill, whereas factory cruise control will waste gas going up grades...
|
That's what motorcyclists fit as a poor man's cruise control: A throttle lock.
Considering that the purpose of cruise control is to lock in a fixed speed, I personally don't see your proposition as being "better." It's just easier to install. It won't ease up on the throttle as you go downhill, nor throttle-off entirely as you descend a steep enough incline, thus wasting fuel needlessly, besides not keeping a steady speed. Do you really
want your car slowing down as it climbs an incline? It's your car, and your call (obviously).
The things I would insist on:
- Automatic disengagement of throttle lock, such as when you touch the brakes, clutch, or shift into neutral without using the clutch
- Easy and unambiguous manual disengagement
In an emergency situation, you definitely don't want to have to manually disengage the throttle lock. Also, nail down what happens when you press the accelerator to pass someone. Does the throttle lock release, or does it lock in at the higher speed?
BTW, the common complaint from bikers with throttle-lock cruise control is that it's an obvious suboptimal solution on anything other than flattish terrain. Better than nothing, but not great.