View Poll Results: Can I remove heavy oxidation?
|
Yes
|
|
1 |
16.67% |
No
|
|
2 |
33.33% |
I don't know.
|
|
3 |
50.00% |
|
|
08-31-2008, 02:19 PM
|
#2
|
Site Team / Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,739
Country: United States
Location: Northern Virginia
|
I would try wet sanding then cover it with some fresh clearcoat. It won't be perfect, but should look a lot better than it does right now.
-Jay
__________________
|
|
|
08-31-2008, 06:02 PM
|
#3
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 698
Country: United States
|
Clearcoats just do that. Maybe you can save it, I've never had any luck.
That is the downside of clearcoats.
The upside of clearcoats is that they look a hell of a lot better for a hell of a lot longer than the old-fashioned metallic paint jobs...had a friend who had a 1967 Ford Galaxie, light metallic blue, had to have the hood repainted in 1971 because the paint was completely toast.
__________________
"We are forces of chaos and anarchy. Everything they say we are we are, and we are very proud of ourselves!" -- Jefferson Airplane
Dick Naugle says: 1. Prepare food fresh. 2. Serve customers fast. 3. Keep place clean.
|
|
|
08-31-2008, 07:41 PM
|
#4
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,027
Country: United States
|
I once had a 1985 Olds Ciera that started shedding the clear coat off the trunk.
I bought a spray can of clear coat and tried to spray over it, but it didn't look much better. I don't recall sanding though so maybe that's why it didn't work out for me.
|
|
|
08-31-2008, 08:18 PM
|
#5
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1
Country: United States
|
Its probably toast. Once the clear starts to come off you need a repaint. They spray the clear when the color coat is still tacky so that they stick together and once the clear is removed it can't just be reapplied. Try this forum, they know a lot about how to restore paint. http://autopia.org/
|
|
|
08-31-2008, 08:26 PM
|
#6
|
Site Team / Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,739
Country: United States
Location: Northern Virginia
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Clearcoats just do that. Maybe you can save it, I've never had any luck.
That is the downside of clearcoats.
The upside of clearcoats is that they look a hell of a lot better for a hell of a lot longer than the old-fashioned metallic paint jobs...had a friend who had a 1967 Ford Galaxie, light metallic blue, had to have the hood repainted in 1971 because the paint was completely toast.
|
It depends... In the early 70's and earlier they used to paint the car, then bake the paint on in an oven. It was nothing to see a 15 or 20 year old car look like new with just a little bit of polishing compound and some wax. By the time the 80's came around the automakers stopped baking the cars. I remember the paint on our 1980 Bonneville was never right, and dad had taken it back to the dealer to have the car repainted. The car looked good for a few years, but then as it aged the repainted portions of the car looked far worse than the panels that the dealer left alone. Now I have the 1998 Sierra. Its going on 11 years old and I rarely wash it, and have never waxed it. The paint still looks pretty darn good. If I actually waxed it it'd be a really nice looking truck. Clearcoats are nice, but still no substitution for baking the paint on the car.
-Jay
|
|
|
08-31-2008, 08:44 PM
|
#7
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,831
|
ratman,
I noticed you have a cavalier. nice choice. I also noticed that you were looking for some other mods. I recently did an extended air dam. this may help with your overheating problem. I used a rubber made trash can and cut a strip to size. I then drilled holes in the original air dam and used universal panel retainers to hold it on. mine is about 6 inches tall and leaves about 4 inches of clearance.
check out my garage, maybe you can get some ideas. your mileage is impressive. I found that there is a gap between the radiator and the bottom of my bumper cover. as long as I don't cover that, I don't overheat. I recently experimented with covering that opening and it got hot and fast.
good luck on your paint issue
__________________
Be the change you wish to see in the world
--Mahatma Gandhi
|
|
|
08-31-2008, 08:47 PM
|
#8
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 81
Country: United States
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay2TheRescue
It depends... In the early 70's and earlier they used to paint the car, then bake the paint on in an oven. It was nothing to see a 15 or 20 year old car look like new with just a little bit of polishing compound and some wax. By the time the 80's came around the automakers stopped baking the cars. I remember the paint on our 1980 Bonneville was never right, and dad had taken it back to the dealer to have the car repainted. The car looked good for a few years, but then as it aged the repainted portions of the car looked far worse than the panels that the dealer left alone. Now I have the 1998 Sierra. Its going on 11 years old and I rarely wash it, and have never waxed it. The paint still looks pretty darn good. If I actually waxed it it'd be a really nice looking truck. Clearcoats are nice, but still no substitution for baking the paint on the car.
-Jay
|
I'm not sure where you got your information, but almost all new cars have a baked on finish nowadays. The modern low VOC finishes need to be baked to lay out properly and to thru-cure.
Jim T.
__________________
Ignorance is lack of knowing; stupidity is false logic
|
|
|
08-31-2008, 09:00 PM
|
#9
|
Site Team / Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,739
Country: United States
Location: Northern Virginia
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim T.
I'm not sure where you got your information, but almost all new cars have a baked on finish nowadays. The modern low VOC finishes need to be baked to lay out properly and to thru-cure.
Jim T.
|
I wasn't aware that they were baking cars again. I know its something that was done, then they stopped. A friend of mine had a 1971 Riviera - Metallic brown. Nine years older than my Bonneville wagon, and looked a heck of a lot nicer. At the time I first met her my wagon was 10 years old and her Riviera was 19. If she had cared enough to wash it her Riviera would have looked much nicer than my Bonneville. She still has the Riviera. Her teenage son is restoring it back to original condition.
-Jay
|
|
|
09-01-2008, 06:45 AM
|
#10
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 81
Country: United States
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay2TheRescue
I wasn't aware that they were baking cars again. I know its something that was done, then they stopped. A friend of mine had a 1971 Riviera - Metallic brown. Nine years older than my Bonneville wagon, and looked a heck of a lot nicer. At the time I first met her my wagon was 10 years old and her Riviera was 19. If she had cared enough to wash it her Riviera would have looked much nicer than my Bonneville. She still has the Riviera. Her teenage son is restoring it back to original condition.
-Jay
|
The "old formulation" otherwise known as lead based single stage metallics would hold up for years with little or no care. In 1987 I did a frame off restoration on a 1972 Jeep CJ5. A rebuilt AMC 401, Saginaw 4 speed, Currie 9inch axles rear AND front, and all new body parts mostly steel except the front fenders. Long story short, I got lazy while cutting in all the panels with Sikkens autocryl single-stage polyurethane and decided to paint the whole truck with it. I integrated clear into the fourth coat (about 80% clear to 20% colour) and later colour sanded and buffed it nice and smooth. I sold the truck to a buddy's dad when I moved to Florida in 1991 and he still owns it today. I saw it in July and the dam thing still looks as good as the day I finished buffing it out, and it's not babied.
Most paints fail due to poor preparation and application.
All of GM's, Fords, Chrysler's, and Toyota's paint quality failures can be traced directly to cost cutting, with some recent problems stemming from unfamiliarity with the newer VOC compliant products. Fords in the late 80's early 90's was trying to cut clearcoat costs. They thought if 1.5 mils of clear costs us say $45.90 average per vehicle what would only applying 1.4 or 1.3 mils save us per vehicle, maybe a dollar per car? Not much when the failure rate goes thru the roof at 1.3 mils of clear and your average warranty repaint was over $1K per vehicle. And they all have tried it at one time or another I only quoted the ones I personally did warranty work on over the years. In 1993 alone I probably respayed 90 or 100 Chevy Suburbans, not a lot of fun I tell you.
Jim T.
__________________
__________________
Ignorance is lack of knowing; stupidity is false logic
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Car Talk & Chit Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
» Fuelly iOS Apps |
|
|
|
» Fuelly Android Apps |
No Threads to Display.
|
|