Quote:
Originally Posted by skewbe
The pictures are a little over the top (and could you remove the dirty socks next time lovemysan?!?)
Might as well be brandishing pictures of your wee-wees, if you weren't compensating already that is
|
you didn't have to post(or look) here. i believe the "we-wees" comment IS more than a little over the top. i've heard "rough necks"(many which are gun owners) are real gentlemen. in other words there's no need to compensate.
not everyone is a perfectionist like you sir. others overlook certain insignificant details. lighten up!
this is the short version of the conclusion to my paper on this subject:
bloodshed by in large is avoided during single gun confrontations. meaning that if a second gun is absent or kept concealed, bodily harm CAN be avoided IF requests are met. HOWEVER, a small % of incidents do still become a bloody encounter.
the problem is, the small % of individuals that kill reguardless, is on the rise.
if someone breaks into my home, i'd rather error on the side that he/she is in the lesser %.
thank you to all who gave suggestions for a first gun. i'll return to this thread to recap when the time comes.