 |
|
12-27-2006, 01:46 PM
|
#1
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,516
|
Give it up for CA... :(
Stolen from the frybrid forums. This goes into effect after the new years, possibly thanks to rendering company lobbying... It means that in order to transport W/VO, you need to pay at least $175 a year, which really pushes the small guys looking for financial incentive out of the picture. Otoh, what I'm hoping happens is that people band together and form co-ops, split the cost and have one person pick up/distribute, or even acquire more diesel/W/VO vehicles so that a license makes sense financially. This may backfire, and result in co-ops taking over more rendering co turf, legally! I mean, if the private party is licensed and offers to take the waste oil for free, or even pay a few cents a gallon, compared to the co that wants to be paid, which will the owner decide to go with...
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by FormulaTwo
I think if i could get that type of FE i would have no problem driving a dildo shaped car.
|
|
|
|
12-27-2006, 02:03 PM
|
#2
|
*shrug*
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
|
Indeed, but ca needs to make up some of the money is loses in gas taxes somewhere. At least they are not making SVO/WVO illegal like the UK has done.
|
|
|
12-27-2006, 02:38 PM
|
#3
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,516
|
But it shouldn't. I mean, it's kinda like a road tax for EVs, they just haven't put anything up yet because there isn't enough use to warrant it. Other alternative fuel vehicles pay a scaled rate depending on size, so something like that could be implemented... I have yet to contact the DMV, but I don't see why the road tax for a sub 4,000lb LPG vehicle shouldn't be the same as a sub 4,000lb biodiesel vehicle. Can't say W/VO because it isn't an EPA approved fuel, but that's another pile o' stuff for another day...
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by FormulaTwo
I think if i could get that type of FE i would have no problem driving a dildo shaped car.
|
|
|
|
12-27-2006, 08:37 PM
|
#4
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,325
|
I read thru most of the sited law, and couldn't tell if this law would affect people who were doing this for personal use, altho it sounded like alot of it was aimed at people who were for hire, or making a profit.
"19316. It is the purpose of this article to prevent the sale and
transfer of illegally obtained inedible kitchen grease.
because you could argue that any bio-fuel is inedible kitchen grease, along with pet food, makeup, any anything else that contains used oil, and there for illegle to transport, but once you obtane your waste oil, I would clame that it's a fuel, at least as long as you prosess it in some way first (filter it thru a sock and it's filtered oil) and last I checked it was perfectly leagle in all 50 states to produce up to 300 gallons every 3 months of your own fuel for personal use without paying taxes or any other fees.
So as I take it, this new law does not affect people who collect waste oil for personal use.
|
|
|
12-27-2006, 08:50 PM
|
#5
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 358
|
Typical of the government money-machine going out of its way to help big oil by making it more difficult to get off of it. I can't wait until we run out of the crap.
|
|
|
12-28-2006, 05:22 PM
|
#6
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 163
|
sorry i'm tired but what does W/Vo mean?
|
|
|
12-28-2006, 05:28 PM
|
#7
|
Supporting Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 318
|
wvo-waste vegatable oil
svo-straight vo
|
|
|
12-28-2006, 05:40 PM
|
#8
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,516
|
I just use the slash to have one term for what people call waste and straight vegetable oil, since I don't see why it's not just called vegetable oil, and if it's used, waste vegetable oil.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by FormulaTwo
I think if i could get that type of FE i would have no problem driving a dildo shaped car.
|
|
|
|
12-30-2006, 11:14 AM
|
#9
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 612
|
Unjust laws shouldn't even be followed. I'd never pay the fee.
As for the tax issue, instead of hiking taxes to make up for lost revenue, cut it out of the profit margins of the contractors who make the roads. Taxes are already much higher than they need to be for the given amount of service we receive. The tax system is being used to line the pockets of shareholders moreso than for performing a specific function. Address this, and we wouldn't need more taxes.
|
|
|
08-01-2009, 01:35 PM
|
#10
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 82
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Toecutter
Unjust laws shouldn't even be followed. I'd never pay the fee.
|
^ ^ Ditto
__________________
Until this moment all that I have known
Is death's attempt at imitating life
And for the first time I am truly alive
-Becoming the Archetype
|
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Car Talk & Chit Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
» Fuelly iOS Apps |
No Threads to Display.
|
» Fuelly Android Apps |
|
|