|
02-08-2015, 02:30 PM
|
#1
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7
Country: United States
Location: Columbus, OH
|
EPA fuel estimates outdated?
Hello,
The EPA estimates for the 2004 Grand Prix 3.8L GAS V6 Automatic 4 Sedan (4 Door) should be 18 MPG city, 28 MPG highway and 21 MPG combined as per the link below:
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Power...ix&srchtyp=ymm
__________________
|
|
|
02-08-2015, 11:03 PM
|
#2
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,900
Country: United States
Location: San Antonio, TX
|
Thanks for bringing this to our attention. I'll see if our team can get this updated on our side soon.
__________________
|
|
|
06-12-2015, 10:00 AM
|
#3
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7
Country: United States
Location: Columbus, OH
|
Are there any updates on this? Mine is still showing the outdated EPA numbers.
|
|
|
06-15-2015, 07:12 PM
|
#4
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,900
Country: United States
Location: San Antonio, TX
|
Sorry for the delay.
Kinda strange that an older vehicle's EPA estimates would change.
We went ahead and updated your vehicle.
|
|
|
06-15-2015, 09:15 PM
|
#5
|
Site Team / Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,739
Country: United States
Location: Northern Virginia
|
I find that sometimes it looks up the estimates wrong. For example, look at my 1998 GMC pickup. The EPA figures the site pulls up are for the regular cab version, not the larger extended cab that I have.
|
|
|
06-16-2015, 04:56 PM
|
#6
|
Site Team
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 176
Country: Canada
|
We have to fuzzy match the vehicles we have to the EPA database, which is why you are given a list of vehicles to choose from. Looking at the 1998 GMC Sierra 1500 5.7L. I only find two available entries, one for manual and one for automatic. I don't see any differentiation based on bed length.
https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/bymo...C_Sierra.shtml
|
|
|
06-16-2015, 08:20 PM
|
#7
|
Site Team / Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,739
Country: United States
Location: Northern Virginia
|
If I look it up on the EPA site, I get 12/13/16. However, Fuelly is pulling up 13/15/17 which after I look it over, is the rating for the 1/2 ton 4wd diesel.
|
|
|
06-16-2015, 09:14 PM
|
#8
|
Site Team
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 176
Country: Canada
|
This is another case of where the values have been updated at some point between when we imported 1998 and now.
I am of the opinion that we should reimport all of the current EPA values. Doing this would require you to re-select your EPA value afterwards.
|
|
|
06-17-2015, 12:01 AM
|
#9
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,386
Country: United Kingdom
Location: Mid Wales
|
Are there any plans to include the NEDC test figures for European users?
|
|
|
06-17-2015, 01:55 PM
|
#10
|
Site Team / Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,739
Country: United States
Location: Northern Virginia
|
I believe in 2008 the EPA ratings were revised for all previous model years so someone could compare 2008 and newer vehicles with 2007 and older. I think you would only have to redo 2007 and older vehicles.
__________________
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Car Talk & Chit Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
» Fuelly iOS Apps |
|
|
|
|
» Fuelly Android Apps |
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:23 AM.