Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryland
Of course, simaler to how a hydrogen powered car takes almost as much energy to compress the hydrogen as it does to electrolize it, these vehicles are going to take alot of compressed air, and I know that air compressers require alot of electricity and matence, imagine a 220volt air compresser running for 3-4 hours straight like a vehicle like this would have onboard for home refillings.
|
Yes, the energy to compress the air has to come from somewhere (grid power, electric cells, mechanical energy from wind, etc). So you shouldn't think of the "air car" as being "free" to run. Rather, I think of this as more of an unusual style electric vehicle (only in this case the storage medium is compressed air, instead of chemical electric batteries).
So I guess the real question is, how efficient are air compressors vs more traditional ways of storing electricity in a car? If the air compressor approach is anywhere near as efficient (in terms of energy out, for electricity put in), than this approach may have some real traction (due to the lower design/build cost, vs more costly electrical batteries to use the electricity directly). OTOH if the compressors are much less efficient (than the batteries we can unrealistically use to store electricity "directly"), than the "air car" is really just another example of a cute hack that doesn't make sense in the larger picture.
So does anyone know what the relative efficiencies of compressed air vs using batteries and electric motors are? As said above, I really think of the "air car" as really just a unique type of EV. So, compared to a more traditional EV, which approach will require more input of electricity to go a given distance?