Quote:
Originally Posted by omgwtfbyobbq
Can't we get away w/ it for high drag/low pressure areas like behind a car? I mean, lets say I'm Ernie and I do tuft tests on my Beetle in order to see if there's a difference via the spoiler. Wouldn't less eddies as indicated by the tuft imply there's a decent chance of a drop in Cd? Or for that matter, if the tufts eddy at one speed but not another, wouldn't this imply that the flow hasn't detached at the point and some speed but may detach higher up at some higher speed, leading to greater drag?
I feel it should be like load wrt efficiency in an engine, but I suppose I'm just grossly oversimplifying it.
|
Lets say it this way.... It's not that there's a change in wake due to a change in cD. It's the other way around - there's a change in cD due to a change in wake. I know it sounds almost exactly the same - I'm just kinda anal about little details like that
But yes, I intuitively agree... See less wild tufts - there's a greater chance for more favorable aero.... With respect to the semi, I think it's a combination of perturbed flow AND slower relative velocity (think corridor effect)
That's why I'd like to put an anemometer on my car
__________________
__________________
Time is the best teacher. Unfortunately it kills all its students.
Bike Miles (Begin Aug. 20 - '07): ~433.2 miles
11/12