Picture of Evo X's underside - Fuelly Forums

Click here to see important news regarding the aCar App

Go Back   Fuelly Forums > Fuel Talk > Aerodynamics
Today's Posts Search Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 12-13-2007, 08:20 AM   #1
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5
Picture of Evo X's underside

This is a scan of a Japanese brochure for the Evo X. It shows some of the aerodynamic highlights of the Evo X's underside.
__________________
s12Dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2007, 10:04 AM   #2
Registered Member
 
GasSavers_SD26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 529
Interesting in how it looks like they are trying to force the air out in the middle of the car. Develop a low pressure zone?
__________________
Dave
GasSavers_SD26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2007, 10:55 AM   #3
Registered Member
 
lunarhighway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 360
might this be something similar as old saab 900 have? some have something the size of a mudflap somewhere half between the front and aft wheels... i think it could angle outward slightly too.... i have yet to find out what it's for, and haven't seen it on any other car thusfar...

the strips on the evo seem easy enough to replicate but i doubt they're usefull for FE... can't remember the last time i felt short of downforce...

to me the car does not look like a good source of inspiration for FE related mods... the front looks like a whole body pannel fell off.... than again it looks agressive and fast etc... and that's what that car is probably about.... just not what i get exited about these days.
__________________

lunarhighway is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2007, 11:28 AM   #4
Registered Member
 
DarbyWalters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 376
Looks like it all directed toward downforce...which makes sense for that type of vehicle.
__________________
2006 Jeep Liberty CRD...Founder of L.O.S.T.
OME 2.25" Lift w/ Toyo Open Country HTs 235/75/16s
ASFIR Alum Eng/Tranny/Transfercase/Fuel Skids
2002 Air Box Mod...Air Tabs (5) on Roof...(3)each behind rear windows
Partial Grill Block with Custom Air Scoop and 3" Open Catback Exhaust
Lambretta UNO150cc 4 Stroke Scooter



DarbyWalters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2007, 06:25 PM   #5
Registered Member
 
Snax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 758
I doubt it is for downforce. The initial angle of attack for the front of them suggests they are intended as spoilers, not airfoils. My bet is on high speed stability enhancement.
__________________
LiberalImage.com

I think, therefore I doubt.
Snax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2007, 12:26 AM   #6
Registered Member
 
DarbyWalters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 376
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snax View Post
I doubt it is for downforce. The initial angle of attack for the front of them suggests they are intended as spoilers, not airfoils. My bet is on high speed stability enhancement.

Hence Downforce...taking air out from underneath a vehicle creates more downforce.
__________________
2006 Jeep Liberty CRD...Founder of L.O.S.T.
OME 2.25" Lift w/ Toyo Open Country HTs 235/75/16s
ASFIR Alum Eng/Tranny/Transfercase/Fuel Skids
2002 Air Box Mod...Air Tabs (5) on Roof...(3)each behind rear windows
Partial Grill Block with Custom Air Scoop and 3" Open Catback Exhaust
Lambretta UNO150cc 4 Stroke Scooter



DarbyWalters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2007, 04:10 AM   #7
Registered Member
 
GasSavers_SD26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 529
If it's moving air from underneath the car, it could aid in dropping the overall height of the car in motion. A reduction in overall height could increase mileage?

I don't necessarily think that would be Mitsu's intent, but it might be an additional benefit.
__________________
Dave
GasSavers_SD26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2007, 07:03 AM   #8
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by SD26 View Post
If it's moving air from underneath the car, it could aid in dropping the overall height of the car in motion. A reduction in overall height could increase mileage?

I don't necessarily think that would be Mitsu's intent, but it might be an additional benefit.
I wouldn't think any of the EVO's aero aids would benefit the hypermiler as it would all be directed towads cooling stabilty and downforce.

On the the Evo 7,8, and 9, the front underpanel was created to help guide air to cool the brakes. This design looks a bit similar, with a little more emphasis on cooling.

I believe that the middle diffusers would have more to do with lateral stability during a turn or cornering. As you turn, a car naturally rolls its weight to the outer wheels. Having these diffusers, you'd probably be able to create some downforce on the inside cornering wheels to help distribute weight to the inner wheels. It would seem that Mistubishi was trying to kill 2 birds with 1 stone by creating cornering stability and redirecting the air away from the rear wheels.

Quote:
My Chrysler has the main grille blocked and has no trouble going up a 7-8% grade for 8 miles at 70mph (that's a 2000ft climb, BTW). Also will cruise all day long on the interstate at 85mph.
You guys also have to remember that this car also has a turbocharged engine which runs at a near constant 15-16 times atmospheric pressures. The engine bay with any turbo car can reach temeratures nearly 200X greater than that of a naturally aspirated car. You would have to sacrifice aero for cooling at that point.
GasSavers_Merc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2007, 07:20 AM   #9
Registered Member
 
GasSavers_SD26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 529
Quote:
Originally Posted by Merc View Post
he engine bay with any turbo car can reach temeratures nearly 200X greater than that of a naturally aspirated car. You would have to sacrifice aero for cooling at that point.
I think you might want to rethink that number.

I have a turbo bus with a very confined space that is operated under a good load of its heavy body and then a trailer. I think at 200X the frame would melt.
__________________
Dave
GasSavers_SD26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2007, 10:48 PM   #10
Registered Member
 
lunarhighway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 360
there's some readable text below the pictures of these things stating +1 and 2 kg extra downforce front and rear at 100 km/h

and +3 and +6 kg at 180km/h

i think i was a test somewhere, might have been autospeed but i'm not sure, where they where testing the shape and size of wheel fairings (these inverse mudflap thingies), to redure drag. when they where placed to far ahead of the wheel drag increased, but so did downforce....

than again it might help stability at well
__________________

lunarhighway is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Fuelly iOS Apps
No Threads to Display.
» Fuelly Android Apps
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.