|
|
04-30-2006, 08:11 PM
|
#51
|
*shrug*
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
|
He's already getting low 80s
He's already getting low 80s on his test track. Mehbe he'll just never leave it,
__________________
|
|
|
04-30-2006, 09:44 PM
|
#52
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 612
Country: United States
|
Yeah, low 80s in imperial
Yeah, low 80s in imperial mpg.
He still needs a front air dam, lowered ride height, side skirts, shaved door handles, rear diffuser, tapered roof spiler, the list goes on...
The impact of all aero mods on highway mpg would be about 40-50% for most cars, but about 5-10% for city mpg.
After that, it's time for weight reduction, and a fuel efficient but powerful diesel. Say, a 112 hp Opel 1.3 CDTI common-rail turbo-diesel. You'd get 90+ mpg with that and aero mods, and 0-60 mph in 7 seconds... Wouldn't that be a real sleeper? And you'd be able to run it on B100...
__________________
|
|
|
04-30-2006, 09:47 PM
|
#53
|
*shrug*
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
|
No, low 80s in us mpg. He
No, low 80s in us mpg. He was at like 99.x in IMP because he said, oh so close to the goal.
|
|
|
04-30-2006, 09:50 PM
|
#54
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 612
Country: United States
|
Wow!
Wow!
He should be shooting for 100s then...
But on his site, his record run is just over 60 U.S. mpg, unless he needs to update.
|
|
|
04-30-2006, 09:52 PM
|
#55
|
*shrug*
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
|
I'm going by what he's done
I'm going by what he's done in his 7.3 mile test loops in the daily report thread. Today he got 81.x us I believe.
|
|
|
04-30-2006, 10:01 PM
|
#56
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,223
Country: United States
|
Re: Yeah, low 80s in imperial
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Toecutter
the list goes on...
|
.... and on... no kidding.
the test loop avg speed is 20 mph, so aero mods have a limited impact there, and the route is pretty optimized (couple of great hills). my main goal is to raise my hwy avg, and aero is the way to go for that.
|
|
|
05-01-2006, 04:40 AM
|
#57
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 933
Country: United States
|
That boat tail should turn a
That boat tail should turn a few heads.
80mpg is crazy. What if you had a tank that was that high. I would of thought it was impossible before i started reading up on fuel economy. Now 40mpg in a hummer wouldn't surprise me.
__________________
2008 EPA adjusted:
Distance traveled by bicycle in 2007= 1,830ish miles
Average commute speed=25mph (yes, that's in a car)
|
|
|
05-02-2006, 05:59 PM
|
#58
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,223
Country: United States
|
i cleaned off the old duct
i cleaned off the old duct tape & cardboard grille block. i have an idea how to do it nicely (have one more krazy karpet left to cut up).
also, i traced the outline of my front wheel well onto newspaper... i see removable highway-only front wheel skirts in my future.
|
|
|
05-03-2006, 02:23 AM
|
#59
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,480
Country: United States
Location: Myrtle Beach, SC
|
Re: i cleaned off the old duct
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
also, i traced the outline of my front wheel well onto newspaper... i see removable highway-only front wheel skirts in my future.
|
I was actually thinking about fromt covers that were held in place with rubberbands that would allow the wheels to push them out when needed. On the inside of the covers would be a small roller on each side for the tire to push against. But that would be way too funky looking. I think I will stick to things that people won't notice. Heck, I average about 30 MPH so aero mods really won't buy me much.
Can you do A-B-A teesting with and without the wheel covers again? I would like to see that repeated with all four wheels covered.
__________________
|
|
|
05-03-2006, 06:16 AM
|
#60
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,223
Country: United States
|
rubber bands, or a sheet of
rubber bands, or a sheet of teflon plastic on the back of the skirt where the tire would contact.
i'll add "wheel skirts: all or nothing" to the things-to-test list. (i'm going to have to quit my work and go into testing full-time.)
i was wondering if there would be some complimentary dynamic in covering all 4 wheels vs. just the rears or just the fronts. e.g. the rears improved FE approx 2.8% at 95 km/h. maybe the fronts will be similar on their own. but maybe the net effect of front + rear skirts will be greater (or less) than simply summing their individual effects.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Car Talk & Chit Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
» Fuelly iOS Apps |
|
|
» Fuelly Android Apps |
|
|
|