looking for aero suggestion - Fuelly Forums

Click here to see important news regarding the aCar App

Go Back   Fuelly Forums > Fuel Talk > Aerodynamics
Today's Posts Search Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 11-03-2007, 05:51 PM   #1
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 5
Country: United States
looking for aero suggestion

Hey there, what we have is a saab sonett III. that I am slowly rebuilding (opposite college). Well when I bought a part car I was lucky enough to get a spare fiberglass body as well . Hmm one stock body AND one low CD body. Does anyone have any suggestions? I plan on doing some scale model and wind tunnel tests.

the top pic should be stock and lowered

the bottom pic should be my first idea
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Sonett_art_2.jpg
Views:	270
Size:	36.7 KB
ID:	867   Click image for larger version

Name:	Sonett_art_21.JPG
Views:	303
Size:	42.4 KB
ID:	868  
__________________

sonettIII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2007, 07:45 PM   #2
Registered Member
 
brucepick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 722
Country: United States
Location: Connecticut
Nice drawings!

Be sure to read the sticky at the top of the aero mods section. Lots of good information there.

I think you're talking about adding:
front air dam (usually good, especially if you add side skirts)
hood scoop (increases drag)
side skirts (works together with air dam)
ultra low profile wheels (not an aero thing really)
wheel skirts (good idea)
boat tail (very good idea if you have the skills etc.)

Re. boat tail, search for posts here by basjoos and then look up his garage entry. He's the boat tail king so far as I know.

Ultra wide, ultra low profile tires probably don't do much for fuel economy. Most of the cars with really good fuel economy (stock) have skinny tires stock. I don't have any other reference on that but I haven't seen much talk here about ultra wide/low tires.
__________________

__________________
Currently getting +/- 50 mpg in fall weather. EPA is 31/39 so not too shabby. WAI, fuel cutoff switch, full belly pan, smooth wheel covers.

Now driving '97 Civic HX; tires ~ 50 psi. '89 Volvo 240 = semi-retired.
brucepick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2007, 08:22 PM   #3
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 5
Country: United States
Thanks I am not into those low pro's either, my bud drafted up the origional, he is deep into the ricer style. Then I added the body mods, Yea I looked and found Basjoos's -> really the inspiration.

The hood scoop is required because the ford v-4 engine actually pops up above the panels. I was thinking however that a little foamboard and some work. To turn it a hood bump shaped like a cowl induction would clear that up.

But other than that, do the lines I drew up look right? I'll probably end up making several variants and analyze for the best. Thanks again
sonettIII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2007, 09:04 PM   #4
Registered Member
 
brucepick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 722
Country: United States
Location: Connecticut
Hopefully basjoos will write in sooner or later.

I remember reading this - maybe someone can confirm or quote - a long sloped nose is better than a front air dam. I have an air dam because I was able to build it. I believe a long nose with gentle slope would be better but it's not a project I can do.

Air dam's benefit is that it prevents the air from making trouble underneath the car. Air dam creates a relative vacuum down there, especially if side skirts are used. HOWEVER you are doing all the work of pushing the air out of the way and maintaining the vacuum.

Much better to have a long gently sloped nose reaching down pretty far. That way the air is gently directed upwards and flows on a smooth path to the windshield and then over the top. If you'll see basjoos' pics that's what he's had for a while now.

Most cars have a nose designed so that if you want to make a long sloped nose, you need to extend the existing nose forward quite a distance. You will have to see what would be needed on your Sonett.
__________________
Currently getting +/- 50 mpg in fall weather. EPA is 31/39 so not too shabby. WAI, fuel cutoff switch, full belly pan, smooth wheel covers.

Now driving '97 Civic HX; tires ~ 50 psi. '89 Volvo 240 = semi-retired.
brucepick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2007, 03:50 AM   #5
Registered Member
 
DarbyWalters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 376
Country: United States
I always like those Sonnet III's and the Opel GT's (Mini Vette)
__________________
2006 Jeep Liberty CRD...Founder of L.O.S.T.
OME 2.25" Lift w/ Toyo Open Country HTs 235/75/16s
ASFIR Alum Eng/Tranny/Transfercase/Fuel Skids
2002 Air Box Mod...Air Tabs (5) on Roof...(3)each behind rear windows
Partial Grill Block with Custom Air Scoop and 3" Open Catback Exhaust
Lambretta UNO150cc 4 Stroke Scooter



DarbyWalters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2007, 08:34 AM   #6
Registered Member
 
GasSavers_TomO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,108
Country: United States
Send a message via AIM to GasSavers_TomO Send a message via MSN to GasSavers_TomO Send a message via Yahoo to GasSavers_TomO
The cowl idea would be better than the scoop for sure. Can you get some pictures of the actual cars?
__________________

Honda Civic VX Info/Links
Remember to use good Webiquette!
Quote:
Originally Posted by ezeedee View Post
controversy is an idea thought up by weak people who are too afraid to hear the truth.
GasSavers_TomO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2007, 09:23 AM   #7
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 5
Country: United States
Thanks for the suggestions. As far as the front one piece goes anything forward of the windshield is sacrificial. There is an incredible amount of room. As long as a hood popup is there for the V-4's height. Until I swap in a shorter motor maybe a diesel.

Oh, and I have though about roof chopping. But given I am 6'3" and the car is only 3'10" tall. Not the mention that shortened glass would be hard to locate. I don't think it is legal around here to use polycarbonate sheets.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Sonett_1.JPG
Views:	285
Size:	95.8 KB
ID:	869   Click image for larger version

Name:	Sonett_2.JPG
Views:	190
Size:	97.0 KB
ID:	870   Click image for larger version

Name:	Sonett_4.JPG
Views:	294
Size:	87.1 KB
ID:	871  
sonettIII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2007, 11:22 AM   #8
Registered Member
 
trebuchet03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 812
Country: United States
Send a message via AIM to trebuchet03
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonettIII View Post

Oh, and I have though about roof chopping. But given I am 6'3" and the car is only 3'10" tall. Not the mention that shortened glass would be hard to locate. I don't think it is legal around here to use polycarbonate sheets.
I'm not sure how common they are, but you can have a glass maker that can handle windshield laminates "cut" the windshield We used a company called Glass Benders - which may be a chain (not sure). But their specialty was marine applications - mostly because they were very near to a large marina
__________________
Time is the best teacher. Unfortunately it kills all its students.


Bike Miles (Begin Aug. 20 - '07): ~433.2 miles

11/12
trebuchet03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2007, 01:03 PM   #9
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 5
Country: United States
Well today I got around to building my model wind tunnel. Pieced together out of a HUGE surplus furnace blower, 1/2 hp electric motor and some plywood.But it is not quite perfected yet. I still need to figure out some smoke generator. Right now I am trying a oil lamp with mineral spirits. I'll see how that works. And I also made up some car profiles with some blueboard.
sonettIII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2007, 06:01 PM   #10
Registered Member
 
basjoos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 392
Country: United States
If you have smooth underbody paneling under your car, then you don't need an air dam, since the main purposes of an air dam is to divert air to keep it from coming into contact with the rough underside typical of most cars and to produce a pocket of low pressure under the car for high speed driving. But the air dam adds frontal area, which hurts FE, and for FE driving you aren't all that concerned about the extreme high speed cornering that the low pressure under the car would help with at the expense of FE. For ultimate FE, I would go with a smooth underpaneling rather than the air dam.

The whole idea of the long sloped nose is that it puts the air-splitting leading edge of the car as low as possible so that most of the air hitting the nose goes smoothly over the car, rather than under the car where it adds to the turbulent drag under the car. Adding the nosepiece to my car noticably improved it's coasting ability and the change in the air flow greatly reduced the number of insects hitting my windshield (and has saved the lives of several birds that are picked up and carried over the car by the airflow rather than hitting the grill like they did before I modified the nose.

Looking at the photos of the Sonett, the main aero defect I notice is the leading edge of the nose is way too high (and flat), so that much of the oncoming airflow is diverted under the car. If you reshape the nose, you can integrate the reshaped nose with a grill block or adjustible radiator inlet door. Also there are some steps at the top of the hatch and behind the door that could be smoothed out. It looks like it would be relatively easy to put a boattail on it. Also it would be worthwhile to reposition the windshield wipers to the bottom of the windshield, and place them behind a windscreen so that they don't add to the drag.
__________________

__________________
]
aerocivic.com
basjoos is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Notes displaying & instead of & creepynut Fuelly Web Support and Community News 1 07-06-2011 03:32 AM
Model Stastics? Londubh Fuelly Web Support and Community News 2 03-25-2009 12:42 PM
VX parts wants GasSavers_Jack Wanted to Buy 1 11-03-2006 10:53 AM
Elevations' effect on Tire Pressure chesspirate General Fuel Topics 7 08-11-2006 02:08 PM

» Fuelly Android Apps
No Threads to Display.
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.