Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
This one throws an interesting twist in the aesthetics vs. style debate:
Nissan R89C with rear wheel skirts
I doubt these are on for styling reasons. That said, if they were useful, why weren't they adopted by every race team? Was the theoretical speed gain offset by the extra time the pit crew needed to remove/reinstall the panel for a wheel change? Brake cooling issues?
Inquiring minds want to know...
|
I've always had a thing for these vehicles, and therefor have done a little bit of research into them. The rear wheel skirts did increase top speed, but there was not only the problem of having to remove them in the pits, but also the fact the tires would run hotter than if they were exposed, and of course the hot brakes, but I'm sure these had their own cooling ducts. I think one of these cars would make a GREAT FE car if you just remove the massive engine, and the massive cooling ducts. The rear spoiler could go as well, and you'd have a VERY clean car. They share a lot of aerodynamic principles with the insight, radiused front wheel wells, covered rear wheel wells, very little detached flow, No A pillar turbulance. The use of Naca ducts is great too! Super light, carbon fiber bodies, and spaceframe chassis. MMM i bet you could get well over 100 mpg with that setup.
Another strange thing is these cars were basically Unlimited as far as modifications, they were on a fuel ration system. They would generate ridiculous power and top speeds in practice session and qualifying, 1000 hp, +200 mph! So fuel economy was actually important to these racers!
I find that exhaust placement very strange on these cars, I see no benefits to routing it to the side of the cars. My perhaps it's to push the laminar flow away from the turbulant wheels? as it is a feature shared on several other group c cars, skirted, and non.
Wheel skirts are definetly different for every car. Mine are HORRIBLE to begin with. Therefor adding just half wheel skirts in the rear netted me a an avg. of 1-2 mpg better at 60 mph. A whole 10% gain! I think test after test has proven them to be good. I"m a little confused as to this topic?