civic vx owners - Fuelly Forums

Click here to see important news regarding the aCar App

Go Back   Fuelly Forums > Fuel Talk > Aerodynamics
Today's Posts Search Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 05-10-2010, 04:26 PM   #1
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1
Country: United States
civic vx owners

I am curious about lowering the stance of my vx and its effect on gas mileage .
Anyone out there with a vx that is lowered , I am interested in your opinions.
__________________

preboss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2010, 07:10 PM   #2
Registered Member
 
GasSavers_TomO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,108
Country: United States
Send a message via AIM to GasSavers_TomO Send a message via MSN to GasSavers_TomO Send a message via Yahoo to GasSavers_TomO
The best way to lower the VX and still retain OEM ride quality is to switch to struts/springs/shocks from an 89-91 Civic/CRX. This will lower the car roughly 1.5"-2" and still ride factory smooth.

Depending on your budget, you can buy all new and be set for about 15+ years. Or you can buy Tein H-Tech or S-Tech springs HERE if you want to stay in the real of the 92-95 struts.

But those springs cost more than what I got a whole OEM 89-91 Civic/CRX for with new struts.

If you go with 89-91 suspension, you must get the front strut forks as well (to fit the front struts properly).

As far as the effects on MPG, lowering a vehicle has some but little effect.
__________________

__________________

Honda Civic VX Info/Links
Remember to use good Webiquette!
Quote:
Originally Posted by ezeedee View Post
controversy is an idea thought up by weak people who are too afraid to hear the truth.
GasSavers_TomO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2010, 12:41 AM   #3
Registered Member
 
imzjustplayin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 720
Country: United States
I really can't recommend lowering your car because my civic is currently lowered quite a bit and it's driving me nuts. Ride quality sucks (clearly from lowering springs) and I scrape against EVERYTHING! Yes had the previous owner used coilovers, this wouldn't be as bad but I hate having to "fall into" my vehicle as it's so low to the ground.

If you want to improve your aerodynamics, don't lower it, instead add an underbody belly pan. By doing this, not only will you improve aero, but it also reduces road noise as well. The civic could really use a belly pan and I'd imagine some big gains can be had with one. I plan on putting one on my civic after I get the exhaust wrapped. (That way, I can cover the entire bottom of the vehicle.)
imzjustplayin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2010, 12:44 AM   #4
Registered Member
 
imzjustplayin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 720
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by TomO View Post
The best way to lower the VX and still retain OEM ride quality is to switch to struts/springs/shocks from an 89-91 Civic/CRX. This will lower the car roughly 1.5"-2" and still ride factory smooth.

Depending on your budget, you can buy all new and be set for about 15+ years. Or you can buy Tein H-Tech or S-Tech springs HERE if you want to stay in the real of the 92-95 struts.

But those springs cost more than what I got a whole OEM 89-91 Civic/CRX for with new struts.

If you go with 89-91 suspension, you must get the front strut forks as well (to fit the front struts properly).

As far as the effects on MPG, lowering a vehicle has some but little effect.
That might not be a good idea when you consider that those vehicles weigh less than even the VX by quite a few pounds. Spring rates might not be sufficient or the springs themselves not bulky enough to handle the weight of the portlier VX. There is a reason why the CRX HF and not the VX is the king of fuel economy when it comes to Hondas. (weight)
imzjustplayin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2010, 06:44 AM   #5
Registered Member
 
GasSavers_TomO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,108
Country: United States
Send a message via AIM to GasSavers_TomO Send a message via MSN to GasSavers_TomO Send a message via Yahoo to GasSavers_TomO
Quote:
Originally Posted by ************* View Post
That might not be a good idea when you consider that those vehicles weigh less than even the VX by quite a few pounds. Spring rates might not be sufficient or the springs themselves not bulky enough to handle the weight of the portlier VX. There is a reason why the CRX HF and not the VX is the king of fuel economy when it comes to Hondas. (weight)
There is some truth to that, but you have to remember that The Civic/CRX Si (2300lbs), DX (2100lbs.), weighed more than the VX. The spring rates are nearly identical (within 25lbs. of the VX springs). It's just that the assembly is shorter overall but still retains the same amount of shock travel.

I've been running the 89-91 setup for a few months now and have not bottomed out the shocks at all. And I take clover leaves fast as well as have done some ice races on this suspension with no ill affects.
__________________

Honda Civic VX Info/Links
Remember to use good Webiquette!
Quote:
Originally Posted by ezeedee View Post
controversy is an idea thought up by weak people who are too afraid to hear the truth.
GasSavers_TomO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2010, 03:36 AM   #6
jmf
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 129
Country: United States
I was wondering if my 17 year old springs were already lowered? How much sag is there in the springs over time?
__________________

jmf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2010, 07:53 AM   #7
Registered Member
 
GasSavers_TomO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,108
Country: United States
Send a message via AIM to GasSavers_TomO Send a message via MSN to GasSavers_TomO Send a message via Yahoo to GasSavers_TomO
I can't say for certain about the sag of the OEM springs but they don't sag much more than 1/4" - 1/2" if they are not cracked/broken.
__________________

Honda Civic VX Info/Links
Remember to use good Webiquette!
Quote:
Originally Posted by ezeedee View Post
controversy is an idea thought up by weak people who are too afraid to hear the truth.
GasSavers_TomO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2010, 05:25 PM   #8
Registered Member
 
IndyFetch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 628
Country: United States
Location: Ohio
I installed Eibach Pro lowering springs/shocks on my VX a few months ago. The ride quality has diminished somewhat (it should get less choppy when I replace the worn-out bushings). I like the lower stance, but keep in mind that I used to have a lowered '99 Civic Si. The springs and shocks improved the handling by quite a bit. (Think: If you do not have to slow down for corners, you do not have to accelerate back up to speed; hence better mileage). The dive and squat are much better, although the body roll is still too much for me. I would like to add some anti-roll bars and a strut tower brace to finish the job.

To answer the original question, I did not see a significant mileage difference after lowering the car. Then again, there are a lot more variables that affect the car.
IndyFetch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2010, 03:12 PM   #9
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 84
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fetch View Post
I installed Eibach Pro lowering springs/shocks on my VX a few months ago. The ride quality has diminished somewhat (it should get less choppy when I replace the worn-out bushings). I like the lower stance, but keep in mind that I used to have a lowered '99 Civic Si. The springs and shocks improved the handling by quite a bit. (Think: If you do not have to slow down for corners, you do not have to accelerate back up to speed; hence better mileage). The dive and squat are much better, although the body roll is still too much for me. I would like to add some anti-roll bars and a strut tower brace to finish the job.

To answer the original question, I did not see a significant mileage difference after lowering the car. Then again, there are a lot more variables that affect the car.

I put Eibach sport lines (a bit stiffer than pro lines) on my 96 d16y5 converted civic dx hatch and did pick up a bit of mileage. I also installed a coroplast belly ban around the same time. I think Fetch and I both lean towards the performance end of things, and often performance and efficiency can go hand in hand.
The gain was less than 5%, but certainly outside of the range of statistical noise, and the car is way more fun to drive. It also has dunlop star spec tires which are quite sticky on HX wheels. I truly do not need to slow down in many many instances where I would with stock struts and springs. I like the firmer precise ride. It depends on your tastes, and pro lines are variable rate spring: a bit softer in the first part of the travel, so the ride would still be quite comfortable (for me anyway...).
mini-e is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2010, 09:51 PM   #10
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 170
Country: United States
Re: civic vx owners

My tein s tech springs with tockico blues ride fine, but it is a fairly big drop. Have not put enough mileage on to know what the effects are. A grille block might do as much good.
__________________

__________________
I exit lean burn when my life is at risk.
1998 Odyssey 24.1 mpg average
1984 crx project now on the road
hondaguy72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MINI First GasSavers_BEEF General Fuel Topics 6 09-21-2009 11:18 AM
126 mpg! Draigflag General Fuel Topics 4 08-20-2009 10:10 PM
Best $100 to spend on a 1980's amarican full sized car. GasSavers_Ryland General Fuel Topics 33 04-22-2008 08:41 PM
Is there a OBDI or OBDII conversion for older vehicles? kozaz General Fuel Topics 3 11-13-2007 08:32 PM
DSG and CVT Erdrick General Fuel Topics 2 10-13-2007 06:41 AM

» Fuelly iOS Apps
» Fuelly Android Apps
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.