Quote:
Originally Posted by sonyhome
OK, all that is cool, but what's the MPG gains from those lil' guys?
0% or 15%???
For some reason I never see that answer. I'd be happy
to buy and paint some if they make a difference besides
subjective "stability" improvments.
Also what's better? VGs or a spoiler above the trunk door
(I drive a CR-V, and even with its square shape doesn't
come with a stock spoiler unlike other SUVs/Vans).
Not sure anyone has made an objective measure of those
on cars with a systematic approach, and gotten positive
MPG results. At least I haven't seen these posts.
Cheers!
|
IMO, its unrealistic to expect a drastic change in FE from any type of VG by itself. They're probably best used as a part of an aerodynamic supplement package(ie:w/grill block, underbody trays, ect.) Then again, I suppose its going to depend on the bodystyle and finding the optimum mounting position. Mitsubishi's testing concentrated on threebox sedans, so I believe that's where you'd potentially see the best improvement. I've installed them on three different twobox vehicles...my `93 Volvo wagon, a `99 Audi A6 Avant, and a `06 Mazda5. Like I mentioned in another post, none of these vehicles have yielded an increase in overall FE from the VG's alone. But I do know they're creating vortices. While driving on rainsoaked roads @ highway speeds, 2 counter-rotating vortices are faintly visible in the water mist behind the car. My Dad also noticed this in his Mazda5. And my friend with the Audi wagon says his rear window stays cleaner on the highway.
And Cheers to U2!
__________________