WOT shifting for autos - Page 3 - Fuelly Forums

Click here to see important news regarding the aCar App

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 06-08-2007, 09:19 PM   #21
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 109
Country: United States
Hate to bring up something so old, but I thought it was interesting. If i'm getting it, we are looking to accelerate as hard as we can while staying in closed loop and shifting early?

I wouldn't mind helping to test this out since i have the manual "auto" feature in my RSX. Just wanna make sure I have the concept right, and wondering if anyone else has more info on their results.
__________________

__________________
My Photosite My Photoblog

bbgobie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2007, 05:42 AM   #22
Registered Member
 
zpiloto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,225
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by bbgobie View Post
Hate to bring up something so old, but I thought it was interesting. If i'm getting it, we are looking to accelerate as hard as we can while staying in closed loop and shifting early?

I wouldn't mind helping to test this out since i have the manual "auto" feature in my RSX. Just wanna make sure I have the concept right, and wondering if anyone else has more info on their results.
Here's a thread on it.
What I found is that the numbers are so close that the way you accelerate is really not much of a factor. In a perfect world it might result is a very slight increase in FE but there are so many varibles dependending on traffic, lenght of runup till you stop again and slope that you really have to master all three accleration techniques to get the best possible FE. YMMV
__________________

zpiloto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2007, 07:06 PM   #23
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 109
Country: United States
If there is gonna be negligible difference WOT IT IS!

I tried driving around that way today. I got worse than my normal FE. But I made a bunch of short trips, with 2 bikes and the rack on the hitch, and A/C for the GF.

TOmmorow is wide open throttle day as I'll have my car at the track, but on monday its back to FE Driving for the daily commute. This tank of gas is gonna suck!

Quote:
Originally Posted by zpiloto View Post
Here's a thread on it.
What I found is that the numbers are so close that the way you accelerate is really not much of a factor. In a perfect world it might result is a very slight increase in FE but there are so many varibles dependending on traffic, lenght of runup till you stop again and slope that you really have to master all three accleration techniques to get the best possible FE. YMMV
__________________
My Photosite My Photoblog

bbgobie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2007, 09:39 PM   #24
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 104
Country: United States
I think whether or not WOT shifting makes sense depends on the traffic pattern. If you are in stop and go traffic it is not going to work. You are going to spend lots of energy to get up to speed then have to stop soon anyways. OTOH, on the highway get up to cruising speed quickly so you can get your best economy more quickly.
__________________

__________________


GasSavers_BluEyes is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why fill my tank? acidtonic Fuelly Web Support and Community News 11 12-27-2010 07:27 AM
Monthly Average Cost per Mile aisbrandtsen Fuelly Web Support and Community News 3 11-14-2008 07:33 AM
This is getting rediculous, LOL Compaq888 General Fuel Topics 4 11-19-2005 08:15 PM

» Fuelly Android Apps
No Threads to Display.
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.