Why is AT less efficient? - Page 3 - Fuelly Forums

Click here to see important news regarding the aCar App

Go Back   Fuelly Forums > Tech, Troubleshooting and Repair > Transmissions and Running Gear
Today's Posts Search Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 02-26-2007, 09:05 AM   #1
Registered Member
 
caprice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 114
Why is AT less efficient?

I know its well known that automatics are less efficient, but why? Is it because of the torque converter (slipping), and pump (extra work), shift points? At a constant cruising speed with the TC lockup engaged, would a AT get the same mileage as a MT with the same gearing?
__________________
David
85 Chevrolet. 30 MPG or bust!
caprice is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Kickstarter - Video Series on Better MPG andyrobo General Fuel Topics 3 03-29-2013 07:49 AM
Making Fuelly more "Shoping" friendly Mashurst Fuelly Web Support and Community News 3 07-16-2010 12:46 AM
Potential Savings Per Fuel-up Suggestion Razinhell Fuelly Web Support and Community News 4 10-30-2009 07:03 AM
Basic Stats poorboymeyer Fuelly Web Support and Community News 2 09-22-2009 08:19 AM
New cars don't get along with fuelly mlocklear Fuelly Web Support and Community News 5 06-13-2009 03:27 AM

» Fuelly iOS Apps
No Threads to Display.
» Fuelly Android Apps
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.