Neutral at stop lights, save gas?? - Page 4 - Fuelly Forums

Click here to see important news regarding the aCar App

Go Back   Fuelly Forums > Tech, Troubleshooting and Repair > Transmissions and Running Gear
Today's Posts Search Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 02-02-2007, 07:01 PM   #31
Registered Member
 
skewbe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 771
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by cfg83 View Post
skewbe -

Do you really think so? I was hoping to *infer* gas consumption from SG behavior.
2 reasons why I think so (I've been meaning to hook up an LED to my injector leads to prove that it ISN'T getting voltage when the scangauge says it is delivering fuel, but haven't gotten to it)

1. in my car, when it is cold and I'm in overrun, I can feel the effects of turning the injector kill switch on and off, but not when it is warmed up. The scan gauge still will read .2 gph in both cases.

2. The scangauge will read .2gph with the injector kill switch held in, though this is understandable as a pulse is still being created, just intercepted on the way to the injector.

It could be that the metro ECU is a little stupid about it? It could be the scangauge is. Or maybe it's an obdII limitation? Or I'm hallucinating?

I don't worry about it too much since I don't normally have any downhills that require engine braking and I try and drive in a style that doesn't require ANY kind of braking.
__________________

__________________
Standard Disclaimer
skewbe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 07:06 PM   #32
Registered Member
 
JanGeo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,444
Country: United States
Location: Tiverton, RI
Send a message via Yahoo to JanGeo
The engine size relates to the injector size - bigger engines use bigger injectors that inject more fuel per msec of pulse so by setting the engine size they can calculate the amount of fuel injected.
I have seen 500-600 mpg on my scangaugeII when I get the idle down to .1gph and am coasting at 50-60 mph.
Keep in mind that all the data that the SG uses is from the ECU an dwe don't know exactly what that info contains.
The Liters setting sounds interesting I may try that.
ALSO DON'T play with the SG with the engine off - seems that can make it crash and lock up - happened to me again this week had to unplug but didn't loose the data this time at least. My remote door locks activated the SG and I didn't turn the ignition key on and it locked up.
__________________

JanGeo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 07:18 PM   #33
ELF
Registered Member
 
ELF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 245
Country: United States
My scan gauge lights up when I hit the remote door locks too.
__________________
ELF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 08:20 PM   #34
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,978
Country: United States
SG: Multiple Vehicles with Accuracy

Quote:
Originally Posted by ELF View Post
My scan gauge lights up when I hit the remote door locks too.
I've had some wierd SG behavior, but it gets around (plugging it into all sorts of rental vehicles). On the '06 Kia Spectra, the car's ECU or the SG malfunctions and loses the ability to calculate MPG and the TPS position. It worked on a new one, so I'm thinking the car didn't like it.

It still is a great, simple, instant-feedback device for OBD-II'ers. The engine displacement is a good question, but seems to be accurate. I've driven everything from a 6.0L V-8 on the SG, down to a 1.6L -- and the pump calcs aren't that far off (as accurate as pumps calcs can be).

I also have a data logging chip for sensing and diagnosis a variety of variables -- to spot trends, etc. I bought it before I heard about the SG -- it uses the same OBD-II port, so I should've waited. I'd like a direct link to a laptop, but I can't see getting much use out of it. With the logger, I can come back and crunch the raw data if I want to.

RH77
__________________
rh77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 08:45 PM   #35
Registered Member
 
skewbe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 771
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by JanGeo View Post
The engine size relates to the injector size - bigger engines use bigger injectors that inject more fuel per msec of pulse so by setting the engine size they can calculate the amount of fuel injected...
I think that's right. Then they multiply the calculated amount by however far off the tank was when compared with a fillup, to account for variances i.e. different injectors, different fuel pressures.
__________________
Standard Disclaimer
skewbe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2007, 11:03 AM   #36
Supporting Member
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,779
Country: United States
rh77 -

Quote:
Originally Posted by rh77 View Post
I've had some wierd SG behavior, but it gets around (plugging it into all sorts of rental vehicles). On the '06 Kia Spectra, the car's ECU or the SG malfunctions and loses the ability to calculate MPG and the TPS position. It worked on a new one, so I'm thinking the car didn't like it.

It still is a great, simple, instant-feedback device for OBD-II'ers. The engine displacement is a good question, but seems to be accurate. I've driven everything from a 6.0L V-8 on the SG, down to a 1.6L -- and the pump calcs aren't that far off (as accurate as pumps calcs can be).

I also have a data logging chip for sensing and diagnosis a variety of variables -- to spot trends, etc. I bought it before I heard about the SG -- it uses the same OBD-II port, so I should've waited. I'd like a direct link to a laptop, but I can't see getting much use out of it. With the logger, I can come back and crunch the raw data if I want to.

RH77
Does the logger help you to monitor the Air/Fuel ratio over time? That way you could see if your Hot Air Intake was working (right?).

CarloSW2
__________________
Old School SW2 EPA ... New School Civic EPA :

What's your EPA MPG? https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/calculatorSelectYear.jsp
cfg83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2007, 08:15 PM   #37
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 77
Country: United States
Location: Lawton, OK
Send a message via ICQ to occupant Send a message via AIM to occupant Send a message via Yahoo to occupant
Speaking of Hondas...I worked at the Civic factory in 1996 and 1997, in the VQD (vehicle quality department or something to that effect), and 2 of my 5 stations required me to drive the car from one line to the next, either out of the water pressure booth and onto final inspection, or from final inspection to the exit line which applied a black wax coating to the underside. We were instructed to start the car, drive it to the next line, and shut it off as fast as possible. This was an effort which allowed two benefits...1) saves fuel, and those guys running around the plant in the older '93 Civic sedan HATED to go get gas for us...2) keeps exhaust temperatures down to avoid setting off the heat alarm because the black wax is flammable until it sets. The automatic cars benefitted more from this procedure than the manuals, according to data collected by me when letting the car idle for x seconds and seeing what readout the temperature gauge on the exit line gave me.

Without question, the Saudi/UAE/Kuwaiti EX coupes with manual transmission could idle the longest time before exceeding the maximum allowable safe temperature. So I would assume the least fuel was being burned in those if the temperatures were lower. That or maybe they didn't have cats.
occupant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2007, 08:48 AM   #38
Registered Member
 
brucepick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 722
Country: United States
Location: Connecticut
Quote:
Originally Posted by omgwtfbyobbq View Post
All modern FI cars should have the injectors turn off (or maybe pulse depending on the post cat O2 reading) above a certain rpm with no throttle, depending on coolant temps (maybe other things too?), when the vehicle is above a certain rpm in any gear...
Cool. Do you know when they started doing that? My car is an '89 Volvo 240 auto trans; can you guess whether the injectors shut off?
__________________
Currently getting +/- 50 mpg in fall weather. EPA is 31/39 so not too shabby. WAI, fuel cutoff switch, full belly pan, smooth wheel covers.

Now driving '97 Civic HX; tires ~ 50 psi. '89 Volvo 240 = semi-retired.
brucepick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2007, 09:25 AM   #39
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,978
Country: United States
Fuel Trim

Quote:
Originally Posted by cfg83 View Post
rh77 - Does the logger help you to monitor the Air/Fuel ratio over time? That way you could see if your Hot Air Intake was working (right?). CarloSW2
It doesn't show A/F ratios but does show long and short-term fuel trim. During inital tests, it showed that higher IA temps improved the trim into a leaner condition, but would tend to enrich the mix at very hot IATs. It's a great device that I rarely use anymore because it plugs-in where the SG does Lots of parameters to choose from. Davis Carchip E/X.

(Wondering) Hmmm...is there an OBD-II splitter out there? like a 1 into 2 deal?

RH77
__________________
rh77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2007, 11:49 AM   #40
Registered Member
 
omgwtfbyobbq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,516
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by brucepick View Post
Cool. Do you know when they started doing that? My car is an '89 Volvo 240 auto trans; can you guess whether the injectors shut off?
I think they started around OBD1, and that pre OBD systems like VW's digi2 didn't, but don't quote me on that. You could hook up an led to an injector circuit pathway and see if it's blinking behavior changes. Or better yet, I've noticed on downhills that are steep enough to coast down in gear at 55mph, the engine temps drop a lot because there's no fuel being injected, but if I'm coasting in N, they stay pretty consistent. Find a big enough hill and watch what happens to the coolant temperatures.
__________________

__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by FormulaTwo
I think if i could get that type of FE i would have no problem driving a dildo shaped car.
omgwtfbyobbq is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Country/Currency Preference pb Fuelly Web Support and Community News 1 10-29-2008 07:27 AM
Hydrogen or H2O Systems 1Jal1 General Fuel Topics 4 10-11-2008 02:20 AM
An American Perspective on Driving in Canada rh77 General Discussion (Off-Topic) 28 03-24-2006 10:42 PM
Experimenting with a new route to work krousdb General Fuel Topics 5 03-18-2006 09:58 AM
"active" aero grille slats on 06 civic concept MetroMPG General Fuel Topics 21 01-03-2006 01:02 PM

» Fuelly Android Apps
No Threads to Display.
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.