Two things;
I had an alignment done last summer. Everything checked out to 0 afterward. However, camber was way off (1.8degrees) because someone had cut the stock front springs to lower it.
I replaced the front struts with junkyard ones I had in the garage. The ride highth was restored, but the alignment shop cautioned me that this was likely to change toe as well as camber.
I used the backyard method tonight, to get a rough idea of what we are looking at. I bungied a 2' level to the tire face in the center at the widest point. I centered the steering wheel. I raised the front end of the vehicle off the ground. I used a standard tape measure to measure the distance to the other front tire to my other 2' level that I held in the same position. This gave me reference point that should be reasonably close to the same on each tire/wheel. Now, I'm aware there are variations in tires from side to side, so I'm guessing my accuracy is probably within a margin of error of 1/8th inch or so.
The difference between the two measurements was 3/4" of an inch. (toe IN) This seems excessive. Assuming that I was able to toe on of the tie rods out so that the tire moved 3/8" of an inch or less, I should be closer to zero, right?
I made an adjustment and got the two numbers within 1/8" of each other. The toe is still slightly in, according to my measurements.
Question 1, how effective is my procedure?
Question 2, shouldn't toe be zero or even slightly out because accelerating a FWD car will pull them in?
Question 3, how much effect would 3/4" have on toe in angle? (not a math wiz here)
I'm aware that alignments are done with the weight of the vehicle on the axles. My method is impossible this way because I can no longer measure in the center of the wheel at it's widest point.
The car drives no differently around town that I can tell so far. I've got a few known hills that I coast from 45mph up to about 62mph by the bottom during EOC. If these hills change dramatically, I can infer results from this low tech testing.
Yes, I could (and will likely have to) go to the alignment shop and pay $75 to have it done again. I'm just trying to keep the expenses low at the moment.
Okay, onto part duex:
I've got two new sumitomo htrt4 tires I just put on. They handle very well at high psi's (running mine at 52, considering increasing to 55). They also have pretty good snow traction for an all season.
The rears are Pirelli P3000's. They are a 75k tire and were on the car when I got it. The web says that pirelli says they are LRR. Forums and this post:
http://www.gassavers.org/showthread....=pirelli+p3000 (about a california study on RR) say that these tires are really bad for RR. In other words, they could be effecting FE negatively).
The questions are:
How bad are these tires for RR?
The tread is at about 1/3 or less left right now. I'm going to have to replace them this summer for a sticker, I think. I'm gonna have dad order me up some for my birthday so I dont have to pay for them.
Will it be worth it to swap them out before they are bald because of the LRR argument? (cost benefit analysis of 3-6 months [1200miles a month] ) I usually run tires to the bitter end because in the summer handling isn't compromised too bad and you save some money/resources by keeping them on until wear bars have been showing a while.
Thanks for the input.
B
__________________