|
|
02-17-2006, 10:55 AM
|
#1
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,460
Country: United States
|
better for the engine to have a valve cover breather and a breather on the intake???
Also would this create a vacuum leak?...
Would it be better for the engine to have a valve cover breather and a breather on the intake???
Also would this create a vacuum leak?
__________________
__________________
|
|
|
02-17-2006, 11:00 AM
|
#2
|
Driving on E
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,110
Country: United States
|
I'm thinking it will create
I'm thinking it will create a vacuum leak. It's also bad to remove this because you won't be able to expell the oil particles in the crankcase, which will hurt your engine in the long run.
If you really want to prevent the oil from re-entering the engine through the intake, install a catch-can inline with the crankcase ventilation and the PCV line.
__________________
|
|
|
02-17-2006, 11:05 AM
|
#3
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 682
Country: United States
|
Valve cover breathers
Breathers were common 40 years ago, but they were phased out to reduce crankcase emissions which, as I remember, were very significant.....about 30% of total uncontrolled emissions. Adding a breather and removing the PCV valve would be VERY bad for the environment.
The simple breathers were replaced with PCV valves. The PCV valve keeps the crankcase relatively free of water vapor, and the oil last slonger and there is less engine corrosion.
I vote to leave the PCV in.
__________________
Capitalism: The cream rises. Socialism: The scum rises.
|
|
|
02-17-2006, 11:09 AM
|
#4
|
*shrug*
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
|
Quote:I vote to leave the
Quote:
I vote to leave the PCV in.
|
Yo tambien. Creo que el medio ambiente es mas importante que su coche de mierda.
|
|
|
02-17-2006, 11:45 AM
|
#5
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,460
Country: United States
|
Re: Valve cover breathers
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sludgy
Breathers were common 40 years ago, but they were phased out to reduce crankcase emissions which, as I remember, were very significant.....about 30% of total uncontrolled emissions. Adding a breather and removing the PCV valve would be VERY bad for the environment.
The simple breathers were replaced with PCV valves. The PCV valve keeps the crankcase relatively free of water vapor, and the oil last slonger and there is less engine corrosion.
I vote to leave the PCV in.
|
What the hell are you talking about??? Nobody mentioned anything about a PVC. I said valve cover. You know the hose that goes from the valve cover to the intake. That one.
__________________
|
|
|
02-17-2006, 11:51 AM
|
#6
|
Driving on E
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,110
Country: United States
|
Re: Valve cover breathers
Quote:
Originally Posted by Compaq888
What the hell are you talking about??? Nobody mentioned anything about a PVC. I said valve cover. You know the hose that goes from the valve cover to the intake. That one.
|
Why such hostility? I don't know how you're going to get people to help you if you're always rude to them.
|
|
|
02-17-2006, 11:53 AM
|
#7
|
*shrug*
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
|
If I remember correctly the
If I remember correctly the hose that goes from the valve cover to the intake is the pcv line.
|
|
|
02-17-2006, 11:55 AM
|
#8
|
Driving on E
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,110
Country: United States
|
Re: If I remember correctly the
Quote:
Originally Posted by SVOboy
If I remember correctly the hose that goes from the valve cover to the intake is the pcv line.
|
That would be incorrect, but it's a very common mistake. No need for anyone to be all hostile over a common mistake.
|
|
|
02-17-2006, 12:03 PM
|
#9
|
*shrug*
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
|
The pcv line has the
The pcv line has the charcoal canister on it already, right? Squarey looking black thing on the b2?
|
|
|
02-17-2006, 12:09 PM
|
#10
|
FE nut
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,020
Country: United States
|
Re: If I remember correctly the
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt Timion
Quote:
Originally Posted by SVOboy
If I remember correctly the hose that goes from the valve cover to the intake is the pcv line.
|
That would be incorrect, but it's a very common mistake. No need for anyone to be all hostile over a common mistake.
|
It seems to me that I've heard that the hose being discussed is used for some type of a balancing effect for the PCV system. Is this correct?
__________________
__________________
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall, torque is how much of the wall you take with you.
2007 Prius,
Team Slow Burn
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Car Talk & Chit Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
» Fuelly iOS Apps |
|
|
|
|
» Fuelly Android Apps |
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:02 AM.