Taller gearing and its negative impact on FE - Fuelly Forums

Click here to see important news regarding the aCar App

Go Back   Fuelly Forums > Tech, Troubleshooting and Repair > General Maintenance and Repair
Today's Posts Search Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 12-04-2006, 08:23 PM   #1
Registered Member
 
Spule 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 175
Country: United States
Taller gearing and its negative impact on FE

All:

With the discussion of Metro gearing, I remembered this and did some digging, and found some of it online:

http://www.studebakerdriversclub.com/tech_gearing.asp

Re-affirms the discussions from 1960-1 in the car mags of the time on the Studebaker Lark FE problems when Stude allowed customers to order specific rear ends and OD on the 6 cyl cars. Cars with 4.10 rear ends were doing better with FE than 3.54. Also, higher top speeds could be had (with much higher engine RPM) in 3rd Vs. 3rd/OD, R&T's January 1960 Lark 6 cyl (flat-head!) test showed 82 mph in 3rd Vs. 78 mph in 3rd/OD (99 in theory) with finaldrive ratios of 4.10 and 2.87.

Why is this? Weight to HP and air/wind resistance.

They were getting in the mid 20s out of the Larks by the way, with 5.90 15 bias tires. I wonder what imrpovement you would see to day with 165 R15 radials alone?

Funny how this car with a 2.7l flat head all castiron six that Stude developed in 1939 with a TINY Carter single throat carb does as well as some of to day!
__________________

__________________
"Knowledge is Good"

-Emil Faber
Spule 4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2006, 09:42 PM   #2
Registered Member
 
GasSavers_Ryland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,325
Country: United States
Send a message via AIM to GasSavers_Ryland
well, where was the power band? creap out of that, and of course mileage is going to suffer.
__________________

GasSavers_Ryland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2006, 12:31 AM   #3
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 541
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spule 4
Funny how this car with a 2.7l flat head all castiron six that Stude developed in 1939 with a TINY Carter single throat carb does as well as some of to day!
In 39 most manufacturers probably were not too interested in fuel economy - gas was cheap.
Cheap fuel and no EPA to worry about allowed manufacturers to run poor designs.

But the flathead could be made to do well in FE , its just no one ever realy wanted to. , especially as hot rodding was much more fun.
onegammyleg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2006, 05:03 AM   #4
Moderator
 
GasSavers_DaX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,209
Country: United States
Tall gearing has done wonders for my FE. Ryland is right...it's all about staying in the power band.
GasSavers_DaX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2006, 08:32 AM   #5
*shrug*
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaX
Tall gearing has done wonders for my FE. Ryland is right...it's all about staying in the power band.
Honda
SVOboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2006, 08:48 AM   #6
Registered Member
 
omgwtfbyobbq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,516
Country: United States
carbed engines are tuned to run best at some rpm. change the gearing w/o futzing with the carb can muss some stuff up.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by FormulaTwo
I think if i could get that type of FE i would have no problem driving a dildo shaped car.
omgwtfbyobbq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2006, 11:27 AM   #7
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 541
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by omgwtfbyobbq
carbed engines are tuned to run best at some rpm. change the gearing w/o futzing with the carb can muss some stuff up.
I'me not sure I understand what you wrote there omgwtfbyobbq., but a well tuned carb can supply good mixtures across a wide range of rev's.

On some primitive carbs you may not have the full range of fuel jets , air jets , emulsion tubes power valves and jets and venturies.
In fact on old Holley carbs that have the metering body between the main body and float chamber there are no adjustments.
So if it doesnt work rite , you will not get it to work rite.

On carbs that these parts are available they can work very well.
onegammyleg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2006, 02:09 PM   #8
Registered Member
 
omgwtfbyobbq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,516
Country: United States
from what i've heard, if you just change gearing on a car w/o adjusting the carb jet/s/float level/etc you can hurt mileage at some speed, since a carb is set so that max vacuum occurs at some rpm. not that you couldn't set it properly in most cases (although that holley sounds like it might be a problem) just that after a significant change in gearing it might need to be adjusted. but then again, i haven't had nearly as much exposure to carbs compared to mech/electronic fi, so this is just what i've heard.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by FormulaTwo
I think if i could get that type of FE i would have no problem driving a dildo shaped car.
omgwtfbyobbq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2006, 06:54 AM   #9
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 238
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by omgwtfbyobbq
carbed engines are tuned to run best at some rpm. change the gearing w/o futzing with the carb can muss some stuff up.
"Futzing with the carb" is always the "way out" of an engine problem...be it poor(er) MPG or low(er) power ( ye ol' butt dyno!). There is , however , something very basic going on inside the engine...it's known as valve timing! Valve timing affects carb (FI) air flow, mixture ratio, engine vacuum curves, mechanical (dis?)advantage, to name a few parameters. What changes valve timing? Nothing (unless you have some pretty expensive hardware in your engine). What determines valve timing? The profile of the camshaft lobes. This is fixed! Some very up-to-date auto mfgrs advance / retard their camshafts , some aftermarket people supply cam followers (lifters) which "pump up" with RPM (Rhodes lifters); most, however, don't address this issue! Progress and profit margin don't get along very well!
__________________

Ted Hart is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Fuelly Android Apps
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.