Synthetic vs. Regular Oil - Page 4 - Fuelly Forums

Click here to see important news regarding the aCar App

Go Back   Fuelly Forums > Tech, Troubleshooting and Repair > General Maintenance and Repair
Today's Posts Search Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 08-08-2008, 02:47 PM   #31
Registered Member
 
bowtieguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,873
Country: United States
Location: orlando, florida
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrjetskey View Post
Hey just an obsevation,arent most sythetics still made from petroleum ??
amsoil and mobile 1(fully synthetic) use a PAO(poly-alpha-olefin) base, which seperates them in quality from petroleum base oils.

this link is long, but you can scroll down to the synthetic section.

http://www.calsci.com/motorcycleinfo/Oils1.html
__________________

bowtieguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2008, 04:12 PM   #32
Registered Member
 
theholycow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,624
Country: United States
Send a message via ICQ to theholycow Send a message via AIM to theholycow Send a message via MSN to theholycow Send a message via Yahoo to theholycow
Actually, I thought Mobil 1 was one of the first Synthetics to switch away from being true synthetic (PAO) to highly processed dinosaur juice.

From your link above:
Quote:
In the late 1990s, Castrol started selling an oil made from Group III base oil and called it SynTec Full Synthetic. Mobil sued Castrol, asserting that this oil was not synthetic, but simply a highly refined petroleum oil, and therefore it was false advertising to call it synthetic. In 1999, Mobil lost their lawsuit. It was decided that the word "synthetic" was a marketing term and referred to properties, not to production methods or ingredients. Castrol continues to make SynTec out of Group III base oils, that is highly purified mineral oil with most all of the cockroach bits removed.

Shortly after Mobil lost their lawsuit, most oil companies started reformulating their synthetic oils to use Group III base stocks instead of PAOs or diester stocks as their primary component. Most of the "synthetic oil" you can buy today is actually mostly made of this highly-distilled and purified dino-juice called Group III oil. Group III base oils cost about half as much as the synthetics. By using a blend of mostly Group III oils and a smaller amount of "true" synthetics, the oil companies can produce a product that has nearly the same properties as the "true" synthetics, and nearly the same cost as the Group III oil. The much more expensive traditional synthetics are now available in their pure forms only in more expensive and harder to obtain oils. To the best of my knowledge, Delvac-1, AMSOil, Redline, and Motul 5100 are the only oils made from pure traditional synthetics.
(Emphasis added) (Hey, he calls it dino-juice too! )
__________________

__________________
This sig may return, some day.
theholycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2008, 06:59 PM   #33
Registered Member
 
bowtieguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,873
Country: United States
Location: orlando, florida
Quote:
Originally Posted by theholycow View Post
Actually, I thought Mobil 1 was one of the first Synthetics to switch away from being true synthetic (PAO) to highly processed dinosaur juice.
mobile produces both, trying to attract all consumers(believers and non-believers of synthetics) presumeably. and of course a variety of pricing(quality) is subsequently offered.

it's been said that of the fully synthetic oils, amsoil uses the best and most expensive PAO base however.
bowtieguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2008, 04:42 AM   #34
Registered Member
 
theholycow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,624
Country: United States
Send a message via ICQ to theholycow Send a message via AIM to theholycow Send a message via MSN to theholycow Send a message via Yahoo to theholycow
According to your own link, Mobil does not make a true synthetic PAO-based oil.
__________________
This sig may return, some day.
theholycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2008, 05:06 AM   #35
Registered Member
 
bowtieguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,873
Country: United States
Location: orlando, florida
Quote:
Originally Posted by theholycow View Post
According to your own link, Mobil does not make a true synthetic PAO-based oil.
very interesting! i must admit, i do not buy mobile 1 any more.

it used to be as follows:

mobile 1 5000 and 7500 were synthetic blends. if it had a guarantee of 10k miles(or more), it was a full synthetic(presumeably PAO based).

if this is true, i have no reason to go back to mobile 1!
bowtieguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2008, 08:13 AM   #36
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 256
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by gork57 View Post
I have seen various claims about synthetic vs. regular oil. An article in the local newspaper stated a 20% improvement in fuel economy; it is also claimed that synthetic oil's change interval is twice that of regular oil (3000 vs. 6000?).

Do these claims hold water? Is synthetic oil worth the additional cost? Would it be worth my while to use it in my '92 VX? Let's face it. I'm such a miser that I'll try just about anything within reason to boost my fuel economy even further than my present 46-47 mpg (other than ridiculous infomercials ).
I run syn and a mopar factory filter in one vehicle With 4.500 - 5,000 mile change intervals. All other fluids (both diff's - t case and tranny are syn also from the factory). I changed the motor oil over to syn at about 9,800 miles after sufficient engine break-in. No noticable difference in gas mileage. I have used both Mobil 1 and Valvoline syn which are both brand names. The Valvoline is less than $20 for a 5 quart jug.

My other vehicle gets dino and a ac delco filter since the day it was new. (150,000 or so miles on it). It will keep getting dino. I usually buy quart bottles since it takes 4 1/2 quarts and the oil cost is somewhere around $12 or so depending which brand and if it is on sale or if I buy a case or what.

I always do my own maintenance - and there is not that much cost difference for whatever that is worth.

While I do believe that syn has superior lube qualities and less friction I really saw no difference in gas mileage.

Your results could vary, depending on the variables involved. This is just my experience with dino and syn.
__________________
Dave
GasSavers_GasUser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2008, 11:12 PM   #37
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 54
Country: United States
I run Amsoil and gained 1.5 MPG in my 01 Chevy Impala!
__________________

__________________
https://www.bestamericanoil.com
smay665949 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Help! AlfieGT Fuelly Web Support and Community News 1 05-23-2011 12:35 AM
Browse Vehicles Add-on jklaiber Fuelly Web Support and Community News 1 08-31-2008 02:07 AM
WTB: VX Cluster limerence Wanted to Buy 1 05-28-2008 08:45 PM
Second odometer for WVO tank? Jetta90GL Vegetable Oil and BioDiesel 2 03-24-2008 01:17 PM
How far do you drive daily? OdieTurbo General Fuel Topics 56 03-31-2007 02:49 AM

» Fuelly iOS Apps
» Fuelly Android Apps
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.